[Bug libstdc++/39491] [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++ not exported anymore

2009-04-21 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #8 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-04-21 14:36 --- - config/abi/pre/gnu.ver needs the __signbitl symbol mentioned as well. - the patch has an empty #ifdef/#endif at the end with this change the symbol is found in the library. checked with a native build on hppa-linux. --

Processed: Re: gcc-4.3: gcc 4.3.2 miscompiles GMP 4.3.0

2009-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 524472 [PR tree-optimization/36765] gcc-4.3: gcc 4.3.2 strict-aliasing bug / miscompiles GMP 4.3.0 Bug#524472: gcc-4.3: gcc 4.3.2 strict-aliasing bug / miscompiles GMP 4.3.0 Changed Bug title to `[PR tree-optimization/36765] gcc-4.3: gcc

[Bug libstdc++/39491] [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++ not exported anymore

2009-04-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.4.0 |4.4.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491 --- You

[Bug target/38293] [4.4/4.5 regression] libgfortran build failure on spu-elf

2009-04-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.4.0 |4.4.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38293 --- You

Bug#524472: gcc-4.3: gcc 4.3.2 miscompiles GMP 4.3.0

2009-04-21 Thread Vincent Lefevre
retitle 524472 [PR tree-optimization/36765] gcc-4.3: gcc 4.3.2 strict-aliasing bug / miscompiles GMP 4.3.0 thanks I've added the upstream bug reference to the title, in case someone else wonders... -- Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.org - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ 100% accessible validated

[Bug libstdc++/39491] [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++ not exported anymore

2009-04-21 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-04-21 17:28 --- Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++ not exported anymore I believe the problem is the symbol was exported when it shouldn't have been. How? This is

Results for 4.3.3 (Debian 4.3.3-8) libjava testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi

2009-04-21 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 15 11:09:23 UTC 2009 (revision 146101) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: Throw_2 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_2 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL:

Results for 4.3.3 (Debian 4.3.3-8) libjava testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

2009-04-21 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 15 11:09:23 UTC 2009 (revision 146101) Target: s390-linux-gnu gcc version 4.3.3 (Debian 4.3.3-8) Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix === libjava Summary for unix === # of expected passes

[Bug libstdc++/39491] [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++ not exported anymore

2009-04-21 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-21 19:49 --- Gcc always seems to optimize the signbit macro. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

[Bug libstdc++/39491] [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++ not exported anymore

2009-04-21 Thread carlos at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #11 from carlos at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-21 20:16 --- Yes, if gcc does not determine that sizeof (x) == sizeof (double) then it would have to emit code for the if-then-else statement and this would create a reference to an undefined __signbitl. Has this ever

[Bug libstdc++/39491] [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++ not exported anymore

2009-04-21 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-04-21 21:01 --- Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++ not exported anymore At present glibc does not create an long double alias for the double __signbit function, but for the

Bug#525083: gcc-defaults: Please enable java on hurd-i386

2009-04-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: gcc-defaults Version: 1.80 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hello, Now that hurd-i386 has gcj-4.3, could you enable java for it as per attached patch? Thanks Samuel -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'),

Bug#525083: gcc-defaults: Please enable java on hurd-i386

2009-04-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Oops, I overwrote the patch with something else in between, here is the proper patch. Samuel Index: debian/control === --- debian/control (révision 3602) +++ debian/control (copie de travail) @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: