Bug#400332: Confirming for g++-4.[34] and gcc-snapshot

2009-07-19 Thread brian m. carlson
I can confirm this bug: lakeview ok % cat foo.cc class Class { public: virtual ~Class(); virtual char const *what() const; }; inline Class::~Class() {} int main() {} lakeview ok % g++-4.3 foo.cc

java-gcj-compat 1.0.80-5.1 MIGRATED to testing

2009-07-19 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the java-gcj-compat source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.80-5 Current version: 1.0.80-5.1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

[Bug bootstrap/40806] Unable Compile GCC on Target

2009-07-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 17:04 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37739 *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/37739] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap broken with core gcc gcc-4.2.x

2009-07-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 17:04 --- *** Bug 40806 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/40806] Unable Compile GCC on Target

2009-07-19 Thread giffordj at la dot twcbc dot com
--- Comment #2 from giffordj at la dot twcbc dot com 2009-07-19 18:41 --- Yes this is a duplicate of the bug 37739, but it's still not fixed. Please re-open one of these. The issue still happens even with the GCC 4.4.1 snapshot -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40806

[Bug bootstrap/40806] Unable Compile GCC on Target

2009-07-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 19:22 --- Re-open on request. A workaround is to use -O1 for building stage1. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/40806] Unable Compile GCC on Target

2009-07-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 19:23 --- I meant to re-open the other one... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37739 *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/37739] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap broken with core gcc gcc-4.2.x

2009-07-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 19:23 --- *** Bug 40806 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37739 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or

[Bug bootstrap/37739] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap broken with core gcc gcc-4.2.x

2009-07-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 19:24 --- Re-open on request. A workaround exists, so certainly not P1. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/38642] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Code with -fPIC results in segfault on ARM (old ABI)

2009-07-19 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #6 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-19 22:29 --- This was fixed for 4.4 by revision 133117, which did a fair amount of stack frame management changes. Applying that change to 4.3-20090712 fixes this test case also for 4.3. I'm not in a position to do a full regression