Bug#161432: [Bug target/8603] [Alpha] s?addl pattern doesn't work

2009-08-10 Thread mattst88 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from mattst88 at gmail dot com 2009-08-11 02:38 --- To show how worthwhile this trivial patch is -- the following table shows the number of times s{4,8}{add,sub}l are used in building the Linux kernel (2.6.31-rc5) with unpatched and patched gcc (4.3.4). un

[Bug bootstrap/40788] [4.5 regression] ICE on sparc: tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'declaration' (var_decl) in gimplify_va_arg_expr, at builtins.c:5107

2009-08-10 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
-- laurent at guerby dot net changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |

[Bug bootstrap/40788] [4.5 regression] ICE on sparc: tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'declaration' (var_decl) in gimplify_va_arg_expr, at builtins.c:5107

2009-08-10 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #7 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-08-10 22:25 --- I tested the following patch and it restores --with-cpu=v8 c,ada bootstrap Index: gcc/builtins.c === --- gcc/builtins.c (revision 150589) +++ gcc/built

Bug#540940: upgrade has broken several packages: java-gcj-compat-headless cannot be configured

2009-08-10 Thread Graham Cobb
Package: java-gcj-compat-headless Version: 1.0.80-5.1 Severity: important Doing 'aptitude safe-upgrade' has left java-gcj-compat-headless not-configurable. The aptitude error is: Setting up java-gcj-compat-headless (1.0.80-5.1) ... update-alternatives: error: alternative rmiregistry can't be ma

Bug#540939: upgrade has broken several packages: gcj-4.4-jre-headless cannot be configured

2009-08-10 Thread Graham Cobb
Package: gcj-4.4-jre-headless Version: 4.4.1-1 Severity: important Doing 'aptitude safe-upgrade' on my squeeze system has resulted in gcj-4.4-jre-headless being unable to be configured. The aptitude error is: Setting up gcj-4.4-jre-headless (4.4.1-1) ... update-alternatives: error: alternative r

[Bug bootstrap/40788] [4.5 regression] ICE on sparc: tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'declaration' (var_decl) in gimplify_va_arg_expr, at builtins.c:5107

2009-08-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 09:10 --- *expr_p = targetm.gimplify_va_arg_expr (valist, type, pre_p, post_p); SET_EXPR_LOCATION (*expr_p, loc); is simply bogus. You can't expect *expr_p being still an expression tree when you throw the gimpli

[Bug bootstrap/40788] [4.5 regression] ICE on sparc: tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'declaration' (var_decl) in gimplify_va_arg_expr, at builtins.c:5107

2009-08-10 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-08-10 08:01 --- The search is not finished but it's likely the following patch: 2009-07-17 Aldy Hernandez Manuel López-Ibáñez PR 40435 ... builtins.c ... Add location argument to ... The ICE happens here: b