Re: Bug#556790: gcc-4.3: unrecognizable insn on alpha

2009-12-01 Thread Michael Cree
On 02/12/09 18:18, Matt Turner wrote: On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Michael Cree wrote: On 18/11/2009, at 9:31 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: gcc-4.3 Version: 4.3.4-5 Hi, I recently started seeing several cases of gcc giving an error message like this: packet-l2tp.c:1680: error: unrecogn

Re: Bug#556790: gcc-4.3: unrecognizable insn on alpha

2009-12-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Michael Cree wrote: > On 18/11/2009, at 9:31 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >> Package: gcc-4.3 >> Version: 4.3.4-5 >> >> Hi, >> >> I recently started seeing several cases of gcc giving an error >> message like this: >> packet-l2tp.c:1680: error: unrecognizable insn: >> (

Bug#556790: gcc-4.3: unrecognizable insn on alpha

2009-12-01 Thread Michael Cree
On 18/11/2009, at 9:31 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: gcc-4.3 Version: 4.3.4-5 Hi, I recently started seeing several cases of gcc giving an error message like this: packet-l2tp.c:1680: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 419 86 84 9 packet-l2tp.c:1585 (set (reg:DI 200) (ne:SI (reg:DI 76

Bug#559074: libffi5: Should perhaps be priority "optional" instead of "extra"

2009-12-01 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Package: libffi5 Version: 3.0.9~rc3-1 Severity: wishlist Looking at the (immediate) reverse dependencies of libffi5, it turns out that most of the reverse dependencies are "Priority: optional", specifically: darcs ghc6 gobject-introspection gtkrsync guile-g-wrap haddock libghc6-mtl-dev libghc6-x

Re: Bug#559045: maildrop filter tolower() and toupper() functionality get optimized out by gcc

2009-12-01 Thread Darac Marjal
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:38:34 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:26:29PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: >> Is there a bug in maildrop-2.2.0/maildrop/recipenode.C that causes it to >> get compiled differently with -O1, or is the problem with the compiler? > > Are you able to produc

Re: Bug#559045: maildrop filter tolower() and toupper() functionality get optimized out by gcc

2009-12-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:26:29PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > Is there a bug in maildrop-2.2.0/maildrop/recipenode.C that causes it to > get compiled differently with -O1, or is the problem with the compiler? Are you able to produce a minimal testcase? Bastian -- Our way is peace.

Bug#558146: marked as done (FTBFS on mipsel: /bin/bash: line 1: 1933 Illegal instruction tar -cf - .)

2009-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:15:22 +0100 with message-id <4b1524fa.3000...@aurel32.net> and subject line Re: Bug#558146: Bug #558146: gnat-4.4: FTBFS on mipsel: /bin/bash: line 1: 1933 Illegal instruction tar -cf - . has caused the Debian Bug report #558146, regarding FTBFS on mipsel: /

Re: Bug#559045: maildrop filter tolower() and toupper() functionality get optimized out by gcc

2009-12-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:50:21PM +, Paul Saunders wrote: > Package: maildrop > Version: 2.2.0-3 > Severity: important > > The tolower() and toupper() function calls in the mailfilter always > return empty results. > Recompiling recipenode.C with -O1 option for gcc instead of -O2 returns > th

Processing of gnat-4.4_4.4.2-3_mipsel.changes

2009-12-01 Thread Archive Administrator
gnat-4.4_4.4.2-3_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnat-4.4-base_4.4.2-3_mipsel.deb libgnat-4.4_4.4.2-3_mipsel.deb libgnatvsn4.4-dev_4.4.2-3_mipsel.deb libgnatvsn4.4_4.4.2-3_mipsel.deb libgnatprj4.4-dev_4.4.2-3_mipsel.deb libgnatprj4.4_4.4.2-3_mipse

Processing of gnat-4.4_4.4.2-3_mipsel.changes

2009-12-01 Thread Archive Administrator
gnat-4.4_4.4.2-3_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: gnat-4.4-base_4.4.2-3_mipsel.deb libgnat-4.4_4.4.2-3_mipsel.deb libgnatvsn4.4-dev_4.4.2-3_mipsel.deb libgnatvsn4.4_4.4.2-3_mipsel.deb libgnatprj4.4-dev_4.4.2-3_mipsel.deb libgnatprj4.4_4

Bug#554960: marked as done (autoconf: Should use alternative mechanisms so old versions could be used easily)

2009-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:35:59 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#554960: autoconf: Should use alternative mechanisms so old versions could be used easily has caused the Debian Bug report #554960, regarding autoconf: Should use alternative mechanisms so old versions coul