Bug#564500: ftp.debian.org: override: gcc-4.3-base:libs/optional

2010-01-09 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: Debian GCC Maintainers Please downgrade the priority of gcc-4.3-base to optional, now that libgcc is built from the gcc-4.4 sources. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

[Bug other/42670] demangler doesn't completely demangle a global constructor symbol

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 19:07 --- Oops, sorry, I stand corrected, needed some sleep... indeed, that reminds me... other/42230 !! ;) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42670 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug other/42670] demangler doesn't completely demangle a global constructor symbol

2010-01-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 18:43 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00446.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug other/42670] demangler doesn't completely demangle a global constructors symbol

2010-01-09 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #3 from ian at airs dot com 2010-01-09 18:16 --- c++filt is part of the binutils, but it just runs the demangler which is part of gcc. Any change here will be a change to the demangler. -- ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Add

Results for 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2010-01-09 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840 Target: sparc-linux-gnu gcc version 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9) Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/abi/guard2.C scan-assemble

Results for 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

2010-01-09 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840 Target: s390-linux-gnu gcc version 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9) Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix === g++ Summary for unix ===

Results for 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2010-01-09 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840 Target: x86_64-linux-gnu gcc version 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9) Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix === g++ Summary for unix

Results for 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9) testsuite on i486-pc-kfreebsd-gnu

2010-01-09 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840 Target: i486-kfreebsd-gnu gcc version 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9) Native configuration is i486-pc-kfreebsd-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix === g++ Summary for uni

Results for 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2010-01-09 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840 Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libgomp tests === Running target unix === libgomp Summary === # of expected passes2424 === libstdc++ tests ==

[Bug other/42670] demangler doesn't completely demangle a global constructors symbol

2010-01-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 16:23 --- libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected has --- --format=gnu-v3 --no-params _GLOBAL__I__Z2fnv global constructors keyed to _Z2fnv global constructors keyed to _Z2fnv --- Shouldn't it be global constructors keyed to

Bug#564232: Bug located in Set_Family function in g-sothco.ads

2010-01-09 Thread Xavier Grave
If I replace : --Sin.Sin_Family := (Has_Sockaddr_Len => True, -- Length => Sin'Size / 8, -- Char_Family => System.OS_Constants.AF_INET); by Thin_Common.Set_Family (Sin.Sin_Family, Family_Inet); The new (bind_socket.adb + patch) code fail again. A look to Set_Family show that since Has_Sockaddr_

Bug#564232: bind behaviour different between linux and freebsd?

2010-01-09 Thread Xavier Grave
original message- De: "Jan-Benedict Glaw" jbg...@lug-owl.de A: "Xavier Grave" gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr, 564...@bugs.debian.org Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 15:36:09 +0100 - > Did you test errno? Please try this: Yes and I ge

Bug#564232: bind behaviour different between linux and freebsd?

2010-01-09 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Sat, 2010-01-09 14:37:58 +0100, Xavier Grave wrote: > >> sin.sin_port = 5786; > > > `errno' should contain more detailed information about why it failed. > > Also, keep in mind that "sin.sin_port = 5786" is probably not what you > > want, think of network byte order! Sparc and PPC are big endi

Bug#564232: bind behaviour different between linux and freebsd?

2010-01-09 Thread Xavier Grave
original message- De: "Jan-Benedict Glaw" jbg...@lug-owl.de A: "Xavier Grave" gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr, 564...@bugs.debian.org Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:24:15 +0100 - >> >> sin.sin_port = 5786; > `errno' should contai

Bug#564232: bind behaviour different between linux and freebsd ?

2010-01-09 Thread Xavier Grave
original message- De: "Jan-Benedict Glaw" jbg...@lug-owl.de A: "Xavier Grave" gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr, 564...@bugs.debian.org Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:24:15 +0100 - > On Sat, 2010-01-09 02:50:23 +0100, Xavier Grave

Bug#564232: bind behaviour different between linux and freebsd ?

2010-01-09 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Sat, 2010-01-09 02:50:23 +0100, Xavier Grave wrote: > The following C code give different results on kfreebsd amd64 on one side > and sparc/powerpc/ on the other side > for kfreebsd amd64 : > xav...@debian:~$ ./bind_socket_c > sin len 16 > res -1 > and > for sparc : > ./xav...@canis-latrans:~$

[Bug other/42670] c++filt/nm --demangle doesn't completely demangle a global constructors symbol

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 10:19 --- c++filt is part of binutils and indeed the PR is about binutils, thus doesn't belong here. If you have strong reasons to believe GCC is at fault, please explain and reopen. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle do