Processing of gcc-4.4_4.4.4-7_amd64.changes

2010-07-13 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.4_4.4.4-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.4_4.4.4-7.dsc gcc-4.4_4.4.4-7.diff.gz gcc-4.4-source_4.4.4-7_all.deb libstdc++6-4.4-doc_4.4.4-7_all.deb gcc-4.4-locales_4.4.4-7_all.deb gcc-4.4-base_4.4.4-7_amd64.deb

gcc-4.4_4.4.4-7_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-07-13 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: cpp-4.4_4.4.4-7_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.4/cpp-4.4_4.4.4-7_amd64.deb fixincludes_4.4.4-7_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.4/fixincludes_4.4.4-7_amd64.deb g++-4.4-multilib_4.4.4-7_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.4/g++-4.4-multilib_4.4.4-7_amd64.deb g++-4.4_4.4.4-7_amd64.deb to

gcc-4.4 override disparity

2010-07-13 Thread Archive Administrator
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): lib32gcc1_4.4.4-7_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says extra. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database,

Results for 4.6.0 20100711 (experimental) [trunk revision 162057] (Debian 20100711-1) testsuite on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

2010-07-13 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 11 09:18:05 UTC 2010 (revision 162057) Target: ia64-linux-gnu gcc version 4.6.0 20100711 (experimental) [trunk revision 162057] (Debian 20100711-1) === acats tests === FAIL: c390002 FAIL: c392002 FAIL: c392003 FAIL: c392013 FAIL: c393008 FAIL:

Bug#588951: gcj-jre-headless: menus missing in Swing applications

2010-07-13 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Package: gcj-jre-headless Version: 4:4.4.4-2 Severity: normal This used to be #413295 against classpath but since classpath and jamvm were removed from unstable I suppose I should file a modified version against gij: Steps to reproduce: 1) cat jmenu.java EOF import javax.swing.*; import

Bug#195344: marked as done ([PR 11443] gdb does not show source of main() for java programs)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #195344, regarding [PR 11443] gdb does not show source of main() for java programs to be marked as done. This

Bug#240550: marked as done ([PR 14759] ServerSocketChannel causes Selector.select() to return immediatly)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #240550, regarding [PR 14759] ServerSocketChannel causes Selector.select() to return immediatly to be marked as

Bug#255525: marked as done ([PR 16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #255525, regarding [PR 16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86 to be

Bug#386443: marked as done (gcj-4.1: UTF-16 endianness differs between gcj and Sun JDK)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #386443, regarding gcj-4.1: UTF-16 endianness differs between gcj and Sun JDK to be marked as done. This means

Bug#340651: marked as done ([PR java/27268] Dies with sigseg)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #340651, regarding [PR java/27268] Dies with sigseg to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#397817: marked as done (libgcj7: JPEG encoder missing in javax.imageio)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #397817, regarding libgcj7: JPEG encoder missing in javax.imageio to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#397853: marked as done (NoClassDefFoundError in case the path contains umlauts)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #397853, regarding NoClassDefFoundError in case the path contains umlauts to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#422569: marked as done (gcj-4.1: gcj debug info emits line 0)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #422569, regarding gcj-4.1: gcj debug info emits line 0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#433051: marked as done (gappletviewer-4.1: Takes up all available memory and CPU cycles and does nothing)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #433051, regarding gappletviewer-4.1: Takes up all available memory and CPU cycles and does nothing to be marked

Bug#451707: marked as done (D should send foo[] as a foo* when used in a variadic argument in extern(C) context)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184537.10815.90403.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gdc-4.1 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #451707, regarding D should send foo[] as a foo* when used in a variadic argument in extern(C) context to be

Bug#455407: marked as done (gcc warnings: #define redefined)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184537.10815.90403.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gdc-4.1 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #455407, regarding gcc warnings: #define redefined to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#464156: marked as done ([PR33263, alpha] gcj testsuite failures)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #464156, regarding [PR33263, alpha] gcj testsuite failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#464160: marked as done ([PR35090, hppa] gcj testsuite failures)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #464160, regarding [PR35090, hppa] gcj testsuite failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#466538: marked as done (gij-4.3: reflection on annotation objects throws IllegalAccessException)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #466538, regarding gij-4.3: reflection on annotation objects throws IllegalAccessException to be marked as done.

Bug#468334: marked as done (gcj-4.3: fails running unit tests from Lucene package where Sun JDK works)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #468334, regarding gcj-4.3: fails running unit tests from Lucene package where Sun JDK works to be marked as

Bug#468775: marked as done (gdc-4.1: ii-esu and projectl FTBFS on ia64: unable to find a register to spill in class 'GR_REGS')

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184537.10815.90403.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gdc-4.1 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #468775, regarding gdc-4.1: ii-esu and projectl FTBFS on ia64: unable to find a register to spill in class

Bug#470823: marked as done (libsaxonb-java: fn:replace() does not work as expected)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #470823, regarding libsaxonb-java: fn:replace() does not work as expected to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#472973: marked as done (gcj-4.3: Depends on Tcl/Tk 8.3 which is subject to removal)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #472973, regarding gcj-4.3: Depends on Tcl/Tk 8.3 which is subject to removal to be marked as done. This means

Bug#478886: marked as done (libgcj9-0: incomplete implementation of printf()/format())

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #478886, regarding libgcj9-0: incomplete implementation of printf()/format() to be marked as done. This means

Bug#487547: marked as done (libgcj9-0: Null Pointer Exception in Datum constructor)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #487547, regarding libgcj9-0: Null Pointer Exception in Datum constructor to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#489138: marked as done (Wrong version info.)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184537.10815.90403.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gdc-4.1 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #489138, regarding Wrong version info. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#498960: marked as done (gdc-4.1: unrecognized command line option -fall-sources)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184537.10815.90403.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gdc-4.1 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #498960, regarding gdc-4.1: unrecognized command line option -fall-sources to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#504621: marked as done (libgcj9-0: Failure in java::util::TreeSet::subSet)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #504621, regarding libgcj9-0: Failure in java::util::TreeSet::subSet to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#506946: marked as done (gij-4.3: System.out.printf(%f) doesn't work)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #506946, regarding gij-4.3: System.out.printf(%f) doesn't work to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#508643: marked as done (libgcj9-0: URI.equals() fails with NullPointerException)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #508643, regarding libgcj9-0: URI.equals() fails with NullPointerException to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#511179: marked as done (dpkg error while configure gij-4.3)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #511179, regarding dpkg error while configure gij-4.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#516267: marked as done (gcj-4.3: number of processors reported by Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() is incorrect)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #516267, regarding gcj-4.3: number of processors reported by Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() is

Bug#519562: marked as done (A -help request is not an error)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #519562, regarding A -help request is not an error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#521582: marked as done (gdc-4.1: circular initialization dependency depending on link order)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184537.10815.90403.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gdc-4.1 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #521582, regarding gdc-4.1: circular initialization dependency depending on link order to be marked as done. This

Bug#521622: marked as done (gdc-4.1: struct layout not the same as gcc on i386)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184537.10815.90403.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gdc-4.1 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #521622, regarding gdc-4.1: struct layout not the same as gcc on i386 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#530005: marked as done (libphobos-4.1-dev: libgphobos cannot be linked by a shared library)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184537.10815.90403.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gdc-4.1 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #530005, regarding libphobos-4.1-dev: libgphobos cannot be linked by a shared library to be marked as done. This

Bug#553159: marked as done (gappletviewer-4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/bin/gappletviewer-4.3 but the package doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #553159, regarding gappletviewer-4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/bin/gappletviewer-4.3

Bug#555801: marked as done (gcj: Creates dummy variables.)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #555801, regarding gcj: Creates dummy variables. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed (with 3 errors): Re: Bug#555801 closed by Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org (gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 555801 Bug #555801 {Done: Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org} [gcj-4.3] gcj: Creates dummy variables. 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. reassign 555801

Bug#479309: marked as done (hangs OOo on ppc)

2010-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id 20100713190146.695.245.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org and subject line gcj-4.2 removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #479309, regarding hangs OOo on ppc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#555801: closed by Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org (gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable)

2010-07-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 21:05, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: Hi Kurt, On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 20:56, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote: reopen 555801 reassign 555801 gcj-4.4 This bug applies to both 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and probably to upstream trunk too.  Reassigning to the current default

[Bug other/42540] c++ error message [vtable undefined] is unhelpful

2010-07-13 Thread jyasskin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from jyasskin at gmail dot com 2010-07-13 22:56 --- I'm working on a patch for this at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01116.html. It works by emitting a fake use of the key method any time a translation unit depends on an imported vtable or typeinfo. --

[Bug other/42540] c++ error message [vtable undefined] is unhelpful

2010-07-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 22:58 --- Reopening -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/42540] c++ error message [vtable undefined] is unhelpful

2010-07-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jyasskin at gmail dot com |dot org