Bug#590266: gcc-4.5: FTBFS on sparc: symbols issues

Source: gcc-4.5 Version: 4.5.0-9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc Hi, your package no longer builds on sparc: | dh_makeshlibs -plib64stdc++6 | dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below

Bug#590038: Update

I downloaded and built gcc/g++-4.5, and got the same problem. I was about to report a bug directly to gcc.gnu.org where I read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#known - C - Casting does not work as expected when optimization is turned on. adding -fstrict-aliasing to the compiler command line solved the

Results for 4.5.1 20100723 (prerelease) (Debian 4.5.0-9) testsuite on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_0_release revision 158339 Target: ia64-linux-gnu gcc version 4.5.1 20100723 (prerelease) (Debian 4.5.0-9) Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix === g++ Summary === #

Processing of gcc-4.5_4.5.0-10_amd64.changes

gcc-4.5_4.5.0-10_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.5_4.5.0-10.dsc gcc-4.5_4.5.0-10.diff.gz gcc-4.5-source_4.5.0-10_all.deb gcj-4.5-jre-lib_4.5.0-10_all.deb gcj-4.5-source_4.5.0-10_all.deb libgcj-doc_4.5.0-10_all.deb

gcc-4.5_4.5.0-10_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-4.5_4.5.0-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.5/cpp-4.5_4.5.0-10_amd64.deb fixincludes_4.5.0-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.5/fixincludes_4.5.0-10_amd64.deb g++-4.5-multilib_4.5.0-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.5/g++-4.5-multilib_4.5.0-10_amd64.deb g++-4.5_4.5.0-10_amd64.deb to

gcc-4.5 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): lib32stdc++6_4.5.0-10_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database,

Processed: reopening 553045

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 553045 Bug #553045 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org} [gcc-4.4] (cross) gcc-4.4/mipsel: lib64gomp1-mipsel-cross/DEBIAN/shlibs: No such file Bug #553047 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org} [gcc-4.4] libc6: (cross)

Bug#553045: but 4.4.1-1 is to be installed.

Dear GCC maintainers, While this bug appears to be fixed in version 4.4.4-6. I still hit same but on 4.4.4-7. Therefore I keep it open in the meanwhile. dh_md5sums -plibgomp1-mipsel-cross -plibgomp1-dbg-mipsel-cross (cd debian/libgomp1-mipsel-cross /dev/null ; find . -type f !

Processed: found 553045 in 4.4.4-7

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 553045 4.4.4-7 Bug #553045 [gcc-4.4] (cross) gcc-4.4/mipsel: lib64gomp1-mipsel-cross/DEBIAN/shlibs: No such file Bug #553047 [gcc-4.4] libc6: (cross) libc-2.10.1.so/powerpc: ELF file data encoding not little-endian Bug #577674 [gcc-4.4]

Bug#553045: but 4.4.1-1 is to be installed.

tag 553045 + help tag 553045 + moreinfo severity 553045 wishlist thanks Hector, please contact the emdebian maintainers about fixing this. I doubt there is anybody within the GCC maintainers who is going to fix this. kthxby, Matthias On 26.07.2010 01:00, Hector Oron wrote: Dear GCC

Processed: Re: Bug#553045: but 4.4.1-1 is to be installed.

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 553045 + help Bug #553045 [gcc-4.4] (cross) gcc-4.4/mipsel: lib64gomp1-mipsel-cross/DEBIAN/shlibs: No such file Bug #553047 [gcc-4.4] libc6: (cross) libc-2.10.1.so/powerpc: ELF file data encoding not little-endian Bug #577674 [gcc-4.4]

Processed: retitle 565742 to gcc-4.4/PPC: does not build GNU_STACK on PPC

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 565742 gcc-4.4/PPC: does not build GNU_STACK on PPC Bug #565742 [gcc-4.4] gcc-4.4 doesn't build a GNU_STACK crosscompiling on arch ppc Changed Bug title to 'gcc-4.4/PPC: does not build GNU_STACK on PPC' from 'gcc-4.4 doesn't build a

Bug#553045: but 4.4.1-1 is to be installed.

Dear Matthias, 2010/7/26, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org: Hector, please contact the emdebian maintainers about fixing this. I doubt there is anybody within the GCC maintainers who is going to fix this. If you lack time I propose myself as GCC co-maintainer to have a look to such failures,