gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5-1.dsc
gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5.orig.tar.gz
gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5-1.diff.gz
gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5-1_amd64.deb
libphobos-4.3-dev_1.060-4.3.5-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian
Accepted:
gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5-1.diff.gz
to main/g/gdc-4.3/gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5-1.diff.gz
gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5-1.dsc
to main/g/gdc-4.3/gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5-1.dsc
gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5-1_amd64.deb
to main/g/gdc-4.3/gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5-1_amd64.deb
gdc-4.3_1.060-4.3.5.orig.tar.gz
to
gcc-4.4_4.4.4-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.4_4.4.4-9.dsc
gcc-4.4_4.4.4-9.diff.gz
gcc-4.4-source_4.4.4-9_all.deb
libstdc++6-4.4-doc_4.4.4-9_all.deb
gcc-4.4-locales_4.4.4-9_all.deb
gcc-4.4-base_4.4.4-9_amd64.deb
gcj-4.4_4.4.4-10_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcj-4.4_4.4.4-10.dsc
gcj-4.4_4.4.4-10.diff.gz
gcj-4.4-jre-lib_4.4.4-10_all.deb
gcj-4.4-source_4.4.4-10_all.deb
libgcj-doc_4.4.4-10_all.deb
gcj-4.4-base_4.4.4-10_amd64.deb
Package: g++-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-8
(Leaving choice of severity to gcc maintainers; at the current stage ppl cannot
migrate to testing although it would fix an RC bug.)
ppl 0.10.2-7 FTBS on armel [1] (exclusively) with test suite failures; this was
extremely surprising as 0.10.2-6 was fine [2] and
Accepted:
cpp-4.4_4.4.4-9_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.4/cpp-4.4_4.4.4-9_amd64.deb
fixincludes_4.4.4-9_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.4/fixincludes_4.4.4-9_amd64.deb
g++-4.4-multilib_4.4.4-9_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.4/g++-4.4-multilib_4.4.4-9_amd64.deb
g++-4.4_4.4.4-9_amd64.deb
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
lib32gcc1_4.4.4-9_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
extra.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database,
Accepted:
gcj-4.4-base_4.4.4-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcj-4.4/gcj-4.4-base_4.4.4-10_amd64.deb
gcj-4.4-jdk_4.4.4-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcj-4.4/gcj-4.4-jdk_4.4.4-10_amd64.deb
gcj-4.4-jre-headless_4.4.4-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcj-4.4/gcj-4.4-jre-headless_4.4.4-10_amd64.deb
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:33:11 +
with message-id e1olhbb-0001rl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#576864: fixed in gcc-4.4 4.4.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #576864,
regarding gfortran-4.4 does not support -Wp, -MD for *.F (4.4 regression,
needed for
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:33:11 +
with message-id e1olhbb-0001rr...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#585925: fixed in gcc-4.4 4.4.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #585925,
regarding g++-4.4: bogus results of complex division
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:33:11 +
with message-id e1olhbb-0001rw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#588381: fixed in gcc-4.4 4.4.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #588381,
regarding Patch for gcc-4.4_4.4.4-6 to allow parameterized build prefix for
package
to be marked
You make everything possible. So, thanks.
--
This is message was sent to you from http://thanks.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Without you I would be unemployed. G++ enables my work.
--
This is message was sent to you from http://thanks.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Aug 14 11:59:20 UTC 2010 (revision 163239)
Target: i486-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.6.0 20100814 (experimental) [trunk revision 163239] (Debian
20100814-1)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2321
# of
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I've requested the removal of swi-prolog on mips #593074 due to my
removal request of openjdk-6 on mips #591998. Please remove ppl because
all reverse depends must be removed.
Torsten
ROOM = request of openjdk maintainer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:52:34PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
sparc had concerns raised about [its] releasability
http://release.debian.org/squeeze/arch_qualify.html indicates the number of
porters and upstream support is
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:29:27AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:52:34PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
sparc had concerns raised about [its] releasability
http://release.debian.org/squeeze/arch_qualify.html
On 18.08.2010 00:29, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:52:34PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
sparc had concerns raised about [its] releasability
http://release.debian.org/squeeze/arch_qualify.html indicates the number of
18 matches
Mail list logo
