Bug#597058: gcc-defaults: Please add Vcs-* fields

2010-09-16 Thread Didier Raboud
Package: gcc-defaults Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, as your source ships svn information, it is obvious that you are using a Vcs for the package maintainance; you could add that information to debian/control: Vcs-Svn:

Bug#597090: libstdc++6-4.5-dev: several STL classes implicitly add to the exception specification of containing classes' destructors

2010-09-16 Thread Simon Richter
Package: libstdc++6-4.5-dev Version: 4.5-20100227-1 Severity: minor Hi, the attached code fails to compile with test.cpp:11: error: looser throw specifier for ‘virtual implementation::~implementation()’ test.cpp:6: error: overriding ‘virtual interface::~interface() throw ()’ The reason for

[Bug c/45691] Floating point comparison failure

2010-09-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 17:08 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 *** *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

2010-09-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #138 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 17:08 --- *** Bug 45691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/45691] Floating point comparison failure

2010-09-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 17:13 --- i?86 is a FLT_EVAL_METHOD 2 target, so for strict C compliance all floating operations and constants are supposed to be evaluated in the precision of long double. The assignment of the constant to a double var or

[Bug c/45691] Floating point comparison failure

2010-09-16 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-16 17:15 --- Thanks Jakub. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45691 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To

Results for 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-7) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2010-09-16 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 14 10:33:43 UTC 2010 (revision 164279) Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libgomp tests === Running target unix === libgomp Summary === # of expected passes2540 === libstdc++ tests ===

Results for 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-7) testsuite on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

2010-09-16 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 14 10:33:43 UTC 2010 (revision 164279) Target: ia64-linux-gnu gcc version 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-7) Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix UNRESOLVED: attribute_plugin.c compilation, -I.

Results for 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-7) testsuite on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu

2010-09-16 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 14 10:33:43 UTC 2010 (revision 164279) Target: x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu gcc version 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-7) Native configuration is x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix UNRESOLVED: attribute_plugin.c compilation, -I.

Results for 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-7) testsuite on i486-pc-kfreebsd-gnu

2010-09-16 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 14 10:33:43 UTC 2010 (revision 164279) Target: i486-kfreebsd-gnu gcc version 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-7) Native configuration is i486-pc-kfreebsd-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix UNRESOLVED: attribute_plugin.c compilation, -I.

Results for 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-7) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

2010-09-16 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 14 10:33:43 UTC 2010 (revision 164279) Target: s390-linux-gnu gcc version 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-7) Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/icf.C scan-assembler .section.*.debug_dcall

[Bug c/45691] Floating point comparison failure

2010-09-16 Thread ian at macky dot net
--- Comment #6 from ian at macky dot net 2010-09-16 17:44 --- Subject: Re: Floating point comparison failure Thanks everyone. I usually do fuzzy floating-point comparison, except in certain special circumstances. I will switch to using double constants; I'm trying for a code that is