Bug#600052: gnat-4.4: FTBFS on armel

2010-10-13 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Package: gnat-4.4 Version: 4.4.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, Your package fails to build from source on armel. The following error was reported: checking for arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc... gnatgcc configure: error: in

Processed: reassign 599973 to gcc-4.5-plugin-dev

2010-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 599973 gcc-4.5-plugin-dev Bug #599973 [src:dehydra] dehydra: FTBFS on armel, mipsel, sparc: config/vxworks-dummy.h: No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package 'src:dehydra' to 'gcc-4.5-plugin-dev'. Bug No longer marked as

Processed: Re: Processed: reassign 599973 to gcc-4.5-plugin-dev

2010-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 599973 dehydra Bug #599973 [gcc-4.5-plugin-dev] dehydra: FTBFS on armel, mipsel, sparc: config/vxworks-dummy.h: No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.5-plugin-dev' to 'dehydra'. thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Processed: reassign 599973 to gcc-4.5-plugin-dev

2010-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 599973 gcc-4.5-plugin-dev Bug #599973 [dehydra] dehydra: FTBFS on armel, mipsel, sparc: config/vxworks-dummy.h: No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package 'dehydra' to 'gcc-4.5-plugin-dev'. done 599973 4.5.1-4 Unknown command

Bug#600052: gnat-4.4: FTBFS on armel

2010-10-13 Thread Ludovic Brenta
For the record, this late in the release cycle I am personally tempted to resolve this bug by dropping support for armel in all Ada packages. The buildds have caused us a lot of trouble in the past and Matthias seems to be the only person willing and able to build manually on armel. If even

Bug#600052: gnat-4.4: FTBFS on armel

2010-10-13 Thread xavier grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 13/10/2010 11:46, Ludovic Brenta a écrit : For the record, this late in the release cycle I am personally tempted to resolve this bug by dropping support for armel in all Ada packages. The buildds have caused us a lot of trouble in the

Bug#600052: gnat-4.4: FTBFS on armel

2010-10-13 Thread Matthias Klose
On 13.10.2010 12:23, xavier grave wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 13/10/2010 11:46, Ludovic Brenta a écrit : For the record, this late in the release cycle I am personally tempted to resolve this bug by dropping support for armel in all Ada packages. The buildds

Bug#600052: gnat-4.4: FTBFS on armel

2010-10-13 Thread Matthias Klose
On 13.10.2010 13:31, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.10.2010 12:23, xavier grave wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 13/10/2010 11:46, Ludovic Brenta a écrit : For the record, this late in the release cycle I am personally tempted to resolve this bug by dropping support for

Results for 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-3) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2010-10-13 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 11 11:00:14 UTC 2010 (revision 165300) Target: x86_64-linux-gnu gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-3) Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix === g++ Summary for unix === # of expected passes

Results for 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-3) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi

2010-10-13 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 11 11:00:14 UTC 2010 (revision 165300) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi === libgomp tests === Running target unix FAIL: libgomp.c/lock-1.c execution test WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: libgomp.fortran/strassen.f90 -O execution test

Results for 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-3) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

2010-10-13 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 11 11:00:14 UTC 2010 (revision 165300) Target: s390-linux-gnu gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-3) Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix === g++ Summary for unix === # of expected passes

Bug#600052: gnat-4.4: FTBFS on armel

2010-10-13 Thread Matthias Klose
On 13.10.2010 15:57, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.10.2010 13:31, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.10.2010 12:23, xavier grave wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 13/10/2010 11:46, Ludovic Brenta a écrit : For the record, this late in the release cycle I am personally tempted