libffi_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: lib64ffi-dev_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.deb to main/libf/libffi/lib64ffi-dev_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.deb lib64ffi6_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.deb to main/libf/libffi/lib64ffi6_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.deb libffi-dev_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.deb to main/libf/libffi/libffi-dev_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.deb libffi6-dbg_3.0.10~r

Bug#626869: gcc-4.6: undefined reference to `_q_add' with -mabi=ieeelongdouble

On 2011-05-24 17:35:24 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > did that work in any earlier version? I could try only with gcc 4.4, 4.5 and 4.6, and none of them work. I don't know what to think about: https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=2030&uid=swg21245006 -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web:

Processing of libffi_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.changes

libffi_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libffi_3.0.10~rc8-2.dsc libffi_3.0.10~rc8-2.diff.gz libffi-dev_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.deb lib64ffi-dev_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.deb libffi6_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.deb lib64ffi6_3.0.10~rc8-2_i386.deb libffi6-dbg_3

Bug#627795: g++-4.6 miscompiles reverse_iterator

Package: g++-4.6 Version: 4.6.0-8 Severity: important The attached test program is supposed to print -42, and does so when compiled with g++-4.4 or g++-4.5. However, it outputs random junk when compiled with g++-4.6: $ g++ -Wall -O2 test.cxx $ ./a.out 31 $ ./a.out 207 $ ./a.out 79 We've dis

Bug#627084: gcc-4.6: miscompile PARI/GP SVN revision 12000

from the upstream report: --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-24 14:53:29 UTC --- > stack_init computes &pari_tree - &s_node which is undefined, stack_alloc > then re-computes one via stack_base. That's broken as well. > > Not sure if this eventually causes the issue, but certainly t

Bug#626869: gcc-4.6: undefined reference to `_q_add' with -mabi=ieeelongdouble

On 05/24/2011 04:59 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Now with the latest gcc-4.6: ay:~> gcc-4.6 --version gcc-4.6 (Debian 4.6.0-7) 4.6.1 20110507 (prerelease) [...] ay:~> gcc-4.6 tst.c -o tst -mabi=ieeelongdouble cc1: warning: using IEEE extended precision long double [enabled by default] /tmp/cczFM

Bug#626869: gcc-4.6: undefined reference to `_q_add' with -mabi=ieeelongdouble

Now with the latest gcc-4.6: ay:~> gcc-4.6 --version gcc-4.6 (Debian 4.6.0-7) 4.6.1 20110507 (prerelease) [...] ay:~> gcc-4.6 tst.c -o tst -mabi=ieeelongdouble cc1: warning: using IEEE extended precision long double [enabled by default] /tmp/cczFMB6p.o: In function `main': tst.c:(.text+0x84): unde

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 627084 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR49140 Bug #627084 [gcc-4.6] gcc-4.6: miscompile PARI/GP SVN revision 12000 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/PR49140'. > tags 627084 + upstream Bug #627084 [gcc-4.6] gcc-4.6: miscompile PARI/

gcc-4.6_4.6.0-9_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: cpp-4.6_4.6.0-9_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/cpp-4.6_4.6.0-9_amd64.deb fixincludes_4.6.0-9_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/fixincludes_4.6.0-9_amd64.deb g++-4.6-multilib_4.6.0-9_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/g++-4.6-multilib_4.6.0-9_amd64.deb g++-4.6_4.6.0-9_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.

gcc-4.6 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): lib32stdc++6_4.6.0-9_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, de

Processing of gcc-4.6_4.6.0-9_amd64.changes

gcc-4.6_4.6.0-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.6_4.6.0-9.dsc gcc-4.6_4.6.0-9.diff.gz gcc-4.6-source_4.6.0-9_all.deb libstdc++6-4.6-doc_4.6.0-9_all.deb gcc-4.6-locales_4.6.0-9_all.deb gcc-4.6-base_4.6.0-9_amd64.deb libgcc1_4.6.0-9_amd64.deb

Bug#626869: gcc-4.6: undefined reference to `_q_add' with -mabi=ieeelongdouble

On 2011-05-24 10:15:56 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 05/16/2011 04:03 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > >Package: gcc-4.6 > >Version: 4.6.0-2 > > >ay:~> gcc-4.4 tst.c -o tst -mabi=ieeelongdouble > > reporting for 4.6 and testing with 4.4? IIRC I tested the different versions and did the report o

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 619963 eglibc Bug #619963 [gcc-4.6] gcc-4.6: wrongly optimizes memmove() into memcpy() Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.6' to 'eglibc'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions gcc-4.6/4.6.0-1. > reassign 624696 eglibc Bug #624696 [exi

Bug#624743: cannot reproduce

Hallo! On Mon, 23 May 2011 23:59:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > [exim4 SEGFAULT with fortifying options] > It looks like gcc-4.6 is here erroneously optimizing > __builtin___memmove_chk into a memcpy call! This is not a GCC bug (), but it is a glibc header bug (

Bug#623791:

On 05/24/2011 10:12 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: I think that patching debian/control.m4 is just work around. It should be cleaned up to get rid of special handling of cross target so one set of rules will be used for all targets. maybe. but I still fail to see why libcloog-ppl-dev is left out

Bug#623791:

I think that patching debian/control.m4 is just work around. It should be cleaned up to get rid of special handling of cross target so one set of rules will be used for all targets. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Bug#626869: gcc-4.6: undefined reference to `_q_add' with -mabi=ieeelongdouble

On 05/16/2011 04:03 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Package: gcc-4.6 Version: 4.6.0-2 ay:~> gcc-4.4 tst.c -o tst -mabi=ieeelongdouble reporting for 4.6 and testing with 4.4? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list