Bug#622698: gcc-4.4: Please disable libstdc++- testsuite on sh4

2011-11-20 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, 2011/11/18 Matthias Klose : > tag 622698 + wontfix > thanks > > On 04/14/2011 02:26 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >> Package: gcc-4.4 >> Version: 4.4.5-14 >> Severity: wishlist >> Tags: patch >> >> sh4 needs much time in a test of gcc. >> It is a test of libstdc++ to spend much time in that (ab

Bug#649307: gnat-4.6: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 (gengtype: Internal error: abort in get_output_file_with_visibility, at gengtype.c:1998)

2011-11-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 15:29 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 11/19/2011 11:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 23:32:48 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > > > >> retitle 649307 FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64: gengtype: Internal error: abort in > >> get_output_file_with_visibility, at g

Bug#649307: gnat-4.6: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 (gengtype: Internal error: abort in get_output_file_with_visibility, at gengtype.c:1998)

2011-11-20 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/19/2011 11:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 23:32:48 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > >> retitle 649307 FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64: gengtype: Internal error: abort in >> get_output_file_with_visibility, at gengtype.c:1998 >> reassign 649307 src:gcc-4.6 >> severity 649307 im

Bug#614254: marked as done ([gcc-4.4] Please support ppc64)

2011-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:33:43 +0900 with message-id <4ec90fc7.3040...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: Bug#614254: [gcc-4.4] Please support ppc64 has caused the Debian Bug report #614254, regarding [gcc-4.4] Please support ppc64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 19, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I think it is time to increase the minimum requirement to 586-class, if > not for wheezy then immediately after. I agree, it's time to weight the costs and benefits of supporting obsolete hardware at the expense of most users. > (Later it should be increased > f

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Guillem Jover writes: > Hi! > > On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 22:42:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have >> long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors >> and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor. >>