any resolution 657157 important for pytables coming?

2012-02-19 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Dear GCC Maintainers, I wonder if someone could look into this issue since it forbids build/use of pytables on armhf disallowing migration to testing. References: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657157 -- =--=

Re: Fwd: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg

2012-02-19 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Samuel, I'm terribly sorry, but most likely I won't look into this in the near future. On weekdays, when done with current work and family stuff, I'm usually too tired to do anything useful. And it is already clear that at least next two weekends will also be occupied. It is a bad idea to

Bug#660525: libffi on m68k failures

2012-02-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: libffi Version: 3.0.10-3 Tags: patch Hi, please add this collection of patches to your next upload, as it fixes some problems on m68k. Thanks, //mirabilos -- emacs als auch vi zum Kotzen finde (joe rules) und pine für den einzig bedienbaren textmode-mailclient halte (und ich hab sie

Bug#660525: libffi on m68k failures

2012-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
On 19.02.2012 19:05, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Source: libffi Version: 3.0.10-3 Tags: patch Hi, please add this collection of patches to your next upload, as it fixes some problems on m68k. Please provide the patch for the version in experimental. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: any resolution 657157 important for pytables coming?

2012-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
On 19.02.2012 17:46, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Dear GCC Maintainers, I wonder if someone could look into this issue since it forbids build/use of pytables on armhf disallowing migration to testing. References: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657157 the upstream report is

Re: any resolution 657157 important for pytables coming?

2012-02-19 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Matthias Klose wrote: I wonder if someone could look into this issue since it forbids build/use of pytables on armhf disallowing migration to testing. References: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657157 the upstream report is about an ice-on-invalid-code,

Processing of gcc-4.6_4.6.2-15_amd64.changes

2012-02-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gcc-4.6_4.6.2-15_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.6_4.6.2-15.dsc gcc-4.6_4.6.2-15.diff.gz gcc-4.6-source_4.6.2-15_all.deb libstdc++6-4.6-doc_4.6.2-15_all.deb gcc-4.6-locales_4.6.2-15_all.deb gcc-4.6-base_4.6.2-15_amd64.deb

gcc-4.6_4.6.2-15_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-02-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: cpp-4.6_4.6.2-15_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/cpp-4.6_4.6.2-15_amd64.deb fixincludes_4.6.2-15_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/fixincludes_4.6.2-15_amd64.deb g++-4.6-multilib_4.6.2-15_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/g++-4.6-multilib_4.6.2-15_amd64.deb g++-4.6_4.6.2-15_amd64.deb to