Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May. So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need to NMU? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-26 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May. So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need to NMU? Stop nagging about the default gcc compiler for

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Svante Signell svante.sign...@telia.com writes: On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May. So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need to NMU? Stop

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-26 Thread Philipp Kern
Svante, am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May. So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-26 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: Svante, am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: sorry, thinko. I did mean End