Bug#678122: output difference?

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:54:35AM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:59:06AM +0200, Philipp Marek wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, could you show the disassembler output of the > > OutputWrite() function for gcc-4.6, and gcc-4.7 with -O1 and -O2? > > > > # objdump -Sgd

Bug#673064: gcc-defaults: don't migrate to wheezy

Hi, This bug prevents gcc-4.6 from migrating to testing with important-severity bug fixes as peter explains: http://lists.debian.org/4fe22188.9020...@p10link.net Is it still the Release Team's wish to roll back the change at this late stage? Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.7

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.7 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #677606 (http://bugs.debian.org/677606) # Bug title: gcc-4.7: ICE compiling ByteToDir(

Bug#678122: output difference?

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:59:06AM +0200, Philipp Marek wrote: > Just out of curiosity, could you show the disassembler output of the > OutputWrite() function for gcc-4.6, and gcc-4.7 with -O1 and -O2? > > # objdump -Sgd > > and pasting only this function might be a good way. Sure, attac