Isn't that something unrelated to multiarch, and better should go upstream?
Matthias
Am 13.03.2014 17:34, schrieb Yunqiang Su:
Package: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9-20140303-1
Hi, you lost a segment of patch in gcc-multiarch.diff for mips64(el), etc
--- gcc-4.9-4.9-20140303.orig/src/gcc/config.gcc
I think so.
Richard is the guy for upstream ?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Isn't that something unrelated to multiarch, and better should go upstream?
Matthias
Am 13.03.2014 17:34, schrieb Yunqiang Su:
Package: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9-20140303-1
I didn't yet look at the patches, and probably won't before 4.9 is released. I
would prefer if you could work on 4.9, and then backport patches to 4.8 if needed.
Am 10.03.2014 10:19, schrieb Dima Kogan:
Package: src:gcc-4.8
Severity: normal
Hi.
This is the cross-build-specific half of the
ppl_1.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ppl_1.1-2.dsc
ppl_1.1-2.debian.tar.xz
libppl13_1.1-2_amd64.deb
libppl-dev_1.1-2_amd64.deb
ppl-dev_1.1-2_amd64.deb
libppl-c4_1.1-2_amd64.deb
libppl-swi_1.1-2_amd64.deb
libppl-doc_1.1-2_all.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:37:04 +0100
Source: ppl
Binary: libppl13 libppl-dev ppl-dev libppl-c4 libppl-doc libppl-swi
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1:1.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_6_4_release revision 197895
Target: powerpc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.6.4 (Debian 4.6.4-6)
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/uninit-pred-3_b.C (test for excess errors)
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_6_4_release revision 197895
Target: i486-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.6.4 (Debian 4.6.4-6)
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/uninit-pred-3_b.C (test for excess errors)
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_6_4_release revision 197895
Target: s390x-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.6.4 (Debian 4.6.4-6)
Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/uninit-pred-3_b.C (test for excess errors)
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Mar 20 11:04:07 UTC 2014 (revision 208693)
Target: i486-kfreebsd-gnu
gcc version 4.7.3 (Debian 4.7.3-12)
Native configuration is i486-pc-kfreebsd-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Mar 20 11:04:07 UTC 2014 (revision 208693)
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.7.3 (Debian 4.7.3-12)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Mar 20 11:04:07 UTC 2014 (revision 208693)
Target: s390x-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.7.3 (Debian 4.7.3-12)
Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata
FAIL:
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_6_4_release revision 197895
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.6.4 (Debian 4.6.4-6)
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/uninit-pred-3_b.C (test for excess errors)
Hi,
thanks for merging back the Ada changes. r7211 did basically remove the
go-use-gold.diff patch, which I did undo again.
upstream now has zcx exception support for ARM, so would it be possible to drop
the sjlj based exception support for the jessie release? Is anybody using this
on
Am 21.03.2014 19:17, schrieb Matthias Klose:
Hi,
thanks for merging back the Ada changes. r7211 did basically remove the
go-use-gold.diff patch, which I did undo again.
upstream now has zcx exception support for ARM, so would it be possible to drop
the sjlj based exception support for the
Matthias Klose writes:
thanks for merging back the Ada changes. r7211 did basically remove
the go-use-gold.diff patch, which I did undo again.
OK.
upstream now has zcx exception support for ARM, so would it be
possible to drop the sjlj based exception support for the jessie
release? Is
gcc-snapshot_20140321-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20140321-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20140321.orig.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20140321-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20140321-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
gcc-4.8_4.8.2-17_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.8_4.8.2-17.dsc
gcc-4.8_4.8.2-17.diff.gz
gcc-4.8-source_4.8.2-17_all.deb
gcj-4.8-jre-lib_4.8.2-17_all.deb
gcj-4.8-source_4.8.2-17_all.deb
libgcj-doc_4.8.2-17_all.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:20:31 +0100
Source: gcc-snapshot
Binary: gcc-snapshot
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 20140321-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers debian-gcc
Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2014 02:09:31 +
with message-id e1wrbnl-0007lz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#742165: fixed in gcc-4.8 4.8.2-17
has caused the Debian Bug report #742165,
regarding gcc-4.8: FTBFS on arm64 due to linaro patch and dfsg docs issue
to be marked as done.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:47:08 +0100
Source: gcc-4.8
Binary: gcc-4.8-base libgcc1 libgcc1-dbg libgcc2 libgcc2-dbg libgcc-4.8-dev
libgcc4 libgcc4-dbg lib64gcc1 lib64gcc1-dbg lib64gcc-4.8-dev lib32gcc1
lib32gcc1-dbg
20 matches
Mail list logo