gcc-4.9.0-11 - curious dependency

Hi there, wanted to upgrade testing-proposed-updates and wordered why some did not. Checking dependencies of *gcc-4.9.0-11* I see this: *conficts: gcc-4.9* So: A package conflicts with itself... Same to gcc-4.9++,ccp-4.9... Please re-check. Kindest Regards, Norbert

Bug#754721: gcc-4.8-hppa64_4.8.3-4: 3.15 and 3.16 Linux kernels fail to boot when built with GCC 4.8.3-4

Package: gcc-4.8 Version: 4.8.3-3 Severity: normal This problem is specific to GCC 4.8.3-4. The kernel boot failure does not occur with 4.8.3-3 and earlier. The boot failure occurs both with the latest Debian 64-bit unstable kernel and user 64-bit kernel builds: Hierarchical RCU

Results for 4.9.0 (Debian 4.9.0-11) testsuite on s390x-ibm-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 12 11:02:22 UTC 2014 (revision 212479) Target: s390x-linux-gnu gcc version 4.9.0 (Debian 4.9.0-11) Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata FAIL:

Results for 4.9.0 (Debian 4.9.0-11) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf

LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 12 11:02:22 UTC 2014 (revision 212479) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf === boehm-gc tests === Running target unix === boehm-gc Summary === # of expected passes12 # of unsupported tests 1

Re: Bug#753079: c++11 mode in GCC is still marked as experimental (although armel needs work)

On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: Hi On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I would rather drop any package which does use c++11 features without any reflection. I now understand the problem. Thanks. On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at