Results for 4.9.2 (Debian/Linaro 4.9.2-2) testsuite on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

2014-11-19 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Nov 17 22:17:25 UTC 2014 (revision 217678) Native configuration is aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu === boehm-gc tests === Running target unix === boehm-gc Summary for unix === # of expected passes12 # of unsupported tests 1

Results for 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-2) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi

2014-11-19 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Nov 17 22:17:25 UTC 2014 (revision 217678) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi === boehm-gc tests === Running target unix === boehm-gc Summary === # of expected passes12 # of unsupported tests 1

Results for 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-2) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu

2014-11-19 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Nov 17 22:17:25 UTC 2014 (revision 217678) Target: i586-linux-gnu gcc version 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-2) Native configuration is i586-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C -O2 AddressSanitizer_HugeMallocTest

Results for 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-2) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf

2014-11-19 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Nov 17 22:17:25 UTC 2014 (revision 217678) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf === boehm-gc tests === Running target unix === boehm-gc Summary for unix === # of expected passes12 # of unsupported tests 1

Results for 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-2) testsuite on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu

2014-11-19 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Nov 17 22:17:25 UTC 2014 (revision 217678) Target: x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu gcc version 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-2) Native configuration is x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/guality/pr55665.C -O2 line 23 p == 40 FAIL:

Results for 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-2) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu

2014-11-19 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Nov 17 22:17:25 UTC 2014 (revision 217678) Target: powerpc-linux-gnu gcc version 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-2) Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/null-deref-1.c -O2 output pattern test,

Results for 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-2) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2014-11-19 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Nov 17 22:17:25 UTC 2014 (revision 217678) Target: sparc-linux-gnu gcc version 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-2) Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/guality/redeclaration1.C -O2 line 17 i == 24 FAIL:

Results for 5.0.0 20141118 (experimental) [trunk revision 217719] (Debian 20141118-1) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2014-11-19 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Nov 18 16:08:01 UTC 2014 (revision 217719) Target: powerpc64le-linux-gnu gcc version 5.0.0 20141118 (experimental) [trunk revision 217719] (Debian 20141118-1) === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of

Results for 5.0.0 20141118 (experimental) [trunk revision 217719] (Debian 20141118-1) testsuite on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

2014-11-19 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Nov 18 16:08:01 UTC 2014 (revision 217719) Native configuration is aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu === boehm-gc tests === Running target unix === boehm-gc Summary === # of expected passes12 # of unsupported tests 1

Processing of gnat-4.9_4.9.2-1_amd64.changes

2014-11-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gnat-4.9_4.9.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnat-4.9_4.9.2-1.dsc gnat-4.9_4.9.2-1.tar.gz gnat-4.9-base_4.9.2-1_amd64.deb libgnat-4.9_4.9.2-1_amd64.deb libgnat-4.9-dbg_4.9.2-1_amd64.deb libgnatvsn4.9-dev_4.9.2-1_amd64.deb

gnat-4.9_4.9.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-11-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:40:07 +0100 Source: gnat-4.9 Binary: gnat-4.9-base gnat-4.9 gnat-4.9-sjlj libgnat-4.9 libgnat-4.9-dbg libgnatvsn4.9-dev libgnatvsn4.9 libgnatvsn4.9-dbg libgnatprj4.9-dev libgnatprj4.9

Re: Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-11-19 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Helmut Grohne wrote: I have to admit that the code is not exactly lightweight. I do understand the desire to get rid it and asked that a ctte ruling does not apply beyond jessie for that reason. Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the code

Re: Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-11-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Don, On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:41:49PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the code which will be in jessie? I (perhaps naïvely) would expect them to be primarily using the code in unstable, and maybe at a late stage of bring-up