Bug#780718: return in ?:-operator with function calls is incorrectly optimized

2015-04-07 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:40:32PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 03/18/2015 11:39 AM, David Kalnischkies wrote: > > Attached is as far as I got in terms of a testcase. Still depends on > > libapt as if I make the method directly available everything is fine… > > would it be possible to have a

Processed: Re: gcc-5 fails to build on hurd-i386

2015-04-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #781424 [src:gcc-5] GCC 5 needs an update for gnat on kfreebsd Added tag(s) patch. -- 781424: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781424 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: gcc-5 fails to build on hurd-i386

2015-04-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Control: tags -1 + patch Hello, Samuel Thibault, le Tue 07 Apr 2015 00:05:01 +0200, a écrit : > Matthias Klose, le Sun 29 Mar 2015 21:44:37 +0200, a écrit : > > this looks like the same issue as for kfreebsd. help would be appreciated. > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=78