Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libtsan0
Bug #796246 [src:linux] FATAL: ThreadSanitizer: unexpected memory mapping
Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'libtsan0'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux/4.1.5-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #796246 to the s
On 2015-08-20 13:19:23 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> see https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html
>
> __attribute__ ((gnu_inline)) should be your fix.
Yes, this has been fixed in GMP 4.2, but the (very old) GMP 4.1 branch
will never be fixed. This is a bit annoying, as for MPFR up to 3.1.x,
we
Version: 4.6.4-4+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package gnat-4.6 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796148
The
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
gnat-4.6 |4.6.4-4 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x
gnat-4.6-base |4.6.4-4 | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i
Version: 4.6.4-2+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package gcj-4.6 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796143
The v
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
gcj-4.6 |4.6.4-2 | source
gcj-4.6-base |4.6.4-2 | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x
gcj-4.6-jdk |4.6.4-2 | am
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #699736,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] Bug box in gnat_to_gnu, at
ada/gcc-interface/trans.c:4526
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #712275,
regarding m68k: bug box when compiling libncursesada
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #747990,
regarding gnat-4.6: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.6)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #671368,
regarding 100% acats test failures on armel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #695349,
regarding gnat-4.6: fails to build os lovelace
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #658566,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] Assert_Failure sinfo.adb:1072 in iterator
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #659674,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] Assert_Failure sinfo.adb:2947
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #658567,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] GCC error on precondition in gnat_to_gnu_entity, at
ada/gcc-interface/decl.c:353
to be marked as done
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #642980,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] [kfreebsd-amd64,mips,mipsel] Bug box in
interpret_loop_phi, at tree-scalar-evolution.c:1645
to be mar
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #540174,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] Bug box Assert_Failure sinfo.adb, error detected
ata-unccon.ads
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #642981,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] armel: ICE in update_ssa_across_abnormal_edges, at
tree-inline.c:1853
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #494945,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] Assert_Failure at atree.adb:886 caused by legal
prefixed notation
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #248167,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] Legal program rejected, expect derived type in
instantiation
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #339356,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] Assert_Failure atree.adb:794 on invalid code (mixture
of protected object and accept of entry family)
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #427107,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] Bug box, Assert_Failure at einfo.adb:846, renaming
predefined "=" and "/="
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #248170,
regarding [Fixed in 4.8] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.10.2(24)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #247020,
regarding [Fixed in 4.7, 4.8] Illegal program not detected, self
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:07:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796143: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #670387,
regarding libgcj12-dev: libgcj.a is not provided
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:07:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796143: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #713126,
regarding gcj-4.6: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: automake (< 1:1.12)
but 1:1.13.3-1 is to be installed
to be marked a
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:07:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796143: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #705986,
regarding gcj-4.6-jdk: adequate reports broken-symlink for manpages fastjar and
ecj
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:07:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796143: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #715080,
regarding Broken library symlink detected in libgcj12-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:07:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796143: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #705984,
regarding gcj-4.6-jre-headless: adequate found broken symlink esp. for 64-bit
systems
to be marked as done.
This means that y
On 08/20/2015 02:39 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2015-08-19 17:36:47 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 08/19/2015 10:48 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> extern __inline__ fn1() { fn2(); }
>>>
>>> main() {}
>>
>> not a bug. if you want to keep gnu89 inline semantics, build using
>> -fgnu89-inline
29 matches
Mail list logo
