Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 924232 5.7.4-1
Bug #924232 [python-notebook, python3-notebook] python{,3}-notebook: unhandled
symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/lib/python{2.7,3}/dist-packages/notebook/static/components/bootstrap
Marked as found in versions
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:23:20 +0100
Source: gcc-9
Architecture: source
Version: 9-20190311-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers
Changed-By: Matthias Klose
Changes:
gcc-9 (9
gcc-9_9-20190311-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-9_9-20190311-1.dsc
gcc-9_9-20190311.orig.tar.gz
gcc-9_9-20190311-1.diff.gz
gcc-9_9-20190311-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Hi all,
On 10-03-2019 13:41, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 11:00:40 -0500, Nick Bowler wrote:
>> I'm not familiar with the library in question but the problem
>> appears to be specific to these __atomic_xyz builtins which seem
>> to get special treatment in g++. Other builtins I
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 06:34:18PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I have no clue, I have never seen that before, and it seems to work fine on
> the
> buildds, and in the cross-toolchain-base* package's autopkg test. Starting
> here
> a build with -j1 to see if it's reproducible.
>
> Is this
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #924325 [src:gcc-8-cross] gcc-8-cross: FTBFS for unknown reasons
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
--
924325: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924325
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: severity -1 important
On 11.03.19 17:34, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:gcc-8-cross
> Version: 26
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Hello Matthias.
>
> I have been unable to build this package for the last 12 months:
[...]
> The only unusual thing is that I'm using a single-CPU virtual machine
>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:34:35PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Status: failed gcc-8-cross_26_amd64-20190309T042203.371Z
I've looked at the log and found a more useful bit:
| ../../gnatbind -I- -nostdinc
-I/<>/gcc/build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnatvsn
-I/<>/gcc/build/gcc/ada/rts -I.
Package: src:gcc-8-cross
Version: 26
Tags: ftbfs
Hello Matthias.
I have been unable to build this package for the last 12 months:
Status: failed gcc-8-cross_4_amd64-20180218T093520Z
Status: failed gcc-8-cross_5_amd64-20180224T160324Z
Status: failed
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #866354 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru } [libstdc++6] armel:
symbol _ZTINSt13__future_base12_Result_baseE, version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 not
defined in file libstdc++.so.6
Bug #873200 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru } [libstdc++6]
/usr/bin/llvm-config-4.0: relocation
Control: reopen -1
Control: tags -1 buster sid
The following breaks are needed to handle the moved symbols from the
pr64735 fix in gcc-6 in stretch->buster upgrades on armel:
dnsdist (<< 1.3.3-3)
lambda-align (<< 1.0.3-5)
libllvm3.8
libllvm3.9
libllvm4.0
mednafen (<< 1.22.1+dfsg-1)
nghttp2-proxy
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 866354
Bug #866354 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru } [libstdc++6] armel:
symbol _ZTINSt13__future_base12_Result_baseE, version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 not
defined in file libstdc++.so.6
Bug #873200 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru } [libstdc++6]
12 matches
Mail list logo
