https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- Comment #213 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #212)
> (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #211)
> > If new reports are going to be marked as duplicates of this, then can it
> > please be moved from SUSPENDED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- Comment #212 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Rich Felker from comment #211)
> If new reports are going to be marked as duplicates of this, then can it
> please be moved from SUSPENDED status to REOPENED? The situation is far
> worse than
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- Comment #210 from Rich Felker ---
If new reports are going to be marked as duplicates of this, then can it please
be moved from SUSPENDED status to REOPENED? The situation is far worse than
what seems to have been realized last this was worked
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- Comment #211 from Rich Felker ---
If new reports are going to be marked as duplicates of this, then can it please
be moved from SUSPENDED status to REOPENED? The situation is far worse than
what seems to have been realized last this was worked
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx
--- Comment #209
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # fix bug metadata to allow archival
> fixed 885143 1:6.4.0~alpha1-0reprotest1
Bug #885143 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libreoffice-gtk2]
libreoffice-gtk2: Drop gtk2 support
There is no source info for the package 'libreoffice-gtk2' at version
7 matches
Mail list logo
