Your message dated Tue, 30 Jan 2024 07:49:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061670: fixed in gcc-14 14-20240130-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061670,
regarding gcc-14: long package description of {cpp,g++}-14-for-{build,host} has
literal arch_gnu
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 30 Jan 2024 07:49:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061647: fixed in gcc-14 14-20240130-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061647,
regarding libgccjit-14-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgccjit-13-doc (and
maybe more old versions)
to be marked as done.
gcc-14_14-20240130-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-14_14-20240130-1.dsc
gcc-14_14-20240130.orig.tar.gz
gcc-14_14-20240130-1.debian.tar.xz
gcc-14_14-20240130-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Control: tags -1 patch
On 2024-01-29 10:23, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> Upstream proposed two patches though, the one I tried is:
>
> libatomic_la_LIBADD += $(addsuffix _8_2_.lo,$(SIZEOBJS))
> +libatomic_la_LIBADD += tas_1_2_.lo
The problem was not the patch, but the fact that it did not include
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1061370 [src:gcc-14] gcc-14 ftbfs on armel
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1061370: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061370
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 2024-01-29 09:04, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Guess that doesn't solve it them, as it's the same problem, the meson
> build tests are failing, all of these should be 'YES':
Upstream proposed two patches though, the one I tried is:
libatomic_la_LIBADD += $(addsuffix _8_2_.lo,$(SIZEOBJS))
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 20:36, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
>
> On 2024-01-29 01:33, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On the Bugzilla report a patch has been linked, would it be possible to
> > backport it, please?
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/644147.html
>
> I have rebuilt
On 2024-01-29 01:33, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On the Bugzilla report a patch has been linked, would it be possible to
> backport it, please?
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/644147.html
I have rebuilt gcc-14 with the attached debdiff, and then tried building
systemd
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 16:38, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> On 2024-01-29 01:33, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > This causes systemd to FTBFS on armel since the new upload of
> > libatomic-14. No other architecture is affected.
> >
> > cc -o systemd-cryptsetup
> >
Hi Luca,
On 2024-01-29 01:33, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> This causes systemd to FTBFS on armel since the new upload of
> libatomic-14. No other architecture is affected.
>
> cc -o systemd-cryptsetup
> systemd-cryptsetup.p/src_cryptsetup_cryptsetup-keyfile.c.o
>
Control: affects -1 systemd
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 20:10:40 +0100 Matthias Klose
wrote:
> On 24.01.24 09:58, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > On 2024-01-23 09:01, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> This is a long standing, re-occurring issue which never has been
> >> forwarded and committed
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 systemd
Bug #1061370 [src:gcc-14] gcc-14 ftbfs on armel
Added indication that 1061370 affects systemd
--
1061370: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061370
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
12 matches
Mail list logo
