Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #735497 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[gcc-9,gcc-10,gcc-11] libgcc1: Can switch to use new
Allow-Internal-Symbol-Groups for aeabi symbols
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and yo
Control: reopen -1
Control: reassign -1 libgcc-s1
On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 15:30:09 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Version: 9.5.0-6+rm
>
> Dear submitter,
>
> as the package gcc-9 has just been removed from the Debian archive
> unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We ar
On 2024-07-28 15:35:35 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Version: 10.5.0-4+rm
>
> Dear submitter,
>
> as the package gcc-10 has just been removed from the Debian archive
> unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
> that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
[...]
Control: reopen -1
Control: reassign -1 libasan8 14.1.0-5
On 2024-07-28 15:27:28 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Version: 9.5.0-6+rm
>
> Dear submitter,
>
> as the package gcc-9 has just been removed from the Debian archive
> unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #930430 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[libasan5] libasan5: AddressSanitizer breaks when LD_PRELOAD is defined
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bu
Version: 10.5.0-4+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package gcc-10 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1076503
The
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
cpp-10 | 10.5.0-4 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el,
s390x
g++-10 | 10.5.0-4 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el,
s390x
g++-10-multilib |
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
cpp-10-aarch64-linux-gnu | 10.5.0-1cross2 | amd64, i386, ppc64el
cpp-10-arm-linux-gnueabi | 10.5.0-1cross2 | amd64, arm64, i386, ppc64el
cpp-10-arm-linux-gnueabihf | 10.5.0-1cross2 | amd64,
Version: 10.5.0-2cross1+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package gcc-10-cross-mipsen has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debia
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
cpp-10-mips-linux-gnu | 10.5.0-1cross1 | amd64, arm64, i386, ppc64el
cpp-10-mips-linux-gnu | 10.5.0-2cross1 | mips64el
cpp-10-mips64-linux-gnuabi64 | 10.5.0-1cross1 | amd64, arm64, i386, pp
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
cpp-10-alpha-linux-gnu | 10.5.0-1cross2 | amd64, i386
cpp-10-hppa-linux-gnu | 10.5.0-1cross2 | amd64, i386
cpp-10-m68k-linux-gnu | 10.5.0-1cross2 | amd64, i386
cpp-10-powerpc-linux-gnu | 10
Version: 9.5.0-6+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package gcc-9 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1076502
The ve
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
cpp-9 | 9.4.0-2+b1 | mips64el
cpp-9 | 9.5.0-6+b2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
g++-9 | 9.4.0-2+b1 | mips64el
g++-9 | 9.5.0-6+b2 | amd64, arm64, arme
Version: 29+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package gcc-9-cross has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1076502
The v
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
cpp-9-aarch64-linux-gnu | 9.5.0-4cross1 | amd64, i386, ppc64el
cpp-9-arm-linux-gnueabi | 9.5.0-4cross1 | amd64, arm64, i386, ppc64el
cpp-9-arm-linux-gnueabihf | 9.5.0-4cross1 | amd64, arm64
Version: 9.3.0-8cross1+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package gcc-9-cross-mipsen has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
cpp-9-mips-linux-gnu | 9.3.0-8cross1 | amd64, arm64, i386, mips64el, ppc64el
cpp-9-mips64-linux-gnuabi64 | 9.3.0-8cross1 | amd64, arm64, i386, mips64el,
ppc64el
cpp-9-mips64el-linux-gnuabi
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #995916,
regarding std::stoi, std::stol, std::stoul, ... broken on sh4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #986629,
regarding ICE in vect_init_pattern_stmt, at tree-vect-patterns.c:116 building
adacontrol
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #983436,
regarding i386-cpuinfo.h missing in gcc-10-plugin-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #979350,
regarding gcc-10: compiling bug of code for
https://github.com/Return-To-The-Roots/s25client
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #978153,
regarding libgphobos-10-dev: include/d/std/stdio.d (and rest of std/*) missing
on PowerPC (eg. ppc64el) architectures only
to
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #976024,
regarding g++-10 crashes for bitpacked enum class
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #977638,
regarding g++-10:s390x: Large classes of std::bitset and std::vector hash
the same
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #975142,
regarding internal compiler error: ‘verify_type’ failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #974781,
regarding gcc-10: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #973698,
regarding g++-10: regresson in 10.2.0-16: internal compiler error: in
tsubst_decl, at cp/pt.c:14666
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #971547,
regarding gcc-10: gm2 should be disabled for cross-builds in debian/rules.defs
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #963564,
regarding gfortran: Internal error when processing pFUnit generated files with
--coverage
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #960643,
regarding gdc-10: manpage and gdc --help doesn't mention -fmain
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #963254,
regarding gcc-10: d/rules.def, set AQ to :all for cross build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #960248,
regarding gdc-10 -flto -fno-weak crashes on some codes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069559,
regarding g++-10: std::regex_constants::multiline (C++17) missing in
-std=gnu++20
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031822,
regarding gcc-10: ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:15310
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Version: 27+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package gcc-9-cross-ports has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1076502
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056766,
regarding gcc-10: Remove references to obsolete dpkg m32r and tilegx arches
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028431,
regarding shows "note: the layout of aggregates containing vectors with 8-byte
alignment has changed in GCC 5" with -Wno-psa
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
cpp-9-alpha-linux-gnu | 9.5.0-4cross1 | amd64, i386
cpp-9-hppa-linux-gnu | 9.5.0-4cross1 | amd64, i386
cpp-9-m68k-linux-gnu | 9.5.0-4cross1 | amd64, i386
cpp-9-powerpc-linux-gnu | 9.5.0-4cr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027065,
regarding GM2 does not compile "Hello, world!"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013122,
regarding gcc-10: internal compiler error: in move_insn
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008098,
regarding gcc-10: segfaults when building WebKitGTK 2.36.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023666,
regarding gcc-10 should not be shipped in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001699,
regarding gcc/MIPS, gdc defines wrong stat_t for N32 and N64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding libgnatcoll-db: FTBFS: raised CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002
overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954681,
regarding CONSTRAINT_ERROR : uintp.adb:2002 overflow check failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #929777,
regarding gcc: some errors in output to .gcda file are not checked
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #748297,
regarding [Fixed in 11] the libgnatvsn patch should be upstreamed or dropped
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #737225,
regarding [Fixed in 11] gnat: decimal type's 'Round does not round, effectively
truncates
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #248680,
regarding [Fixed in 11] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.4.1(5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #717014,
regarding [fixed in 11] on some archs, a library using Elementary_Functions
needs -lm
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:32:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1040624,
regarding gcc-10-cross-mipsen ftbfs in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:32:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032218,
regarding gcc-10-cross-mipsen: not binNMU-safe
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #994108,
regarding gcc-9: do not release with bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #961011,
regarding g++-9: internal compiler error: in asan_expand_mark_ifn, at
asan.c:3194
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #966194,
regarding gcc-9: valgrind error: Conditional jump or move depends on
uninitialised value(s)
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #956829,
regarding tumiki-fighters: Crash with undefined symbol
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #956820,
regarding gccgo does not implement syscall in hurd-i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #955533,
regarding gcc-9: -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc causes undefined reference to
__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #951423,
regarding gunroar: symbol lookup error: gunroar: undefined symbol:
_D4core4stdc5errno5errnoFNbNdNiNeZi
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #954806,
regarding gcc-9: Optimizes away something it shouldn't
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #950747,
regarding projectl: Projectl fails to run with current libgphobos76
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #951294,
regarding parsec47: exits with an error immediately after starting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #947751,
regarding gcc/g++: fails to build ceph on armel/armhf/mipsel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #949745,
regarding firefox-esr 68.4 don't start if installed gcc 9.2.1-24
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #947500,
regarding Missing -latomic on mipsel & armel only?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #945133,
regarding gcc-9: __has_attribute(ifunc) false positive on hurd and kfreebsd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #946678,
regarding [cpp-9] Cannot compile inline asm statement with -m32
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #939655,
regarding g++ v9 with OpenMP segfaults with shared vectors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #930430,
regarding libasan5: AddressSanitizer breaks when LD_PRELOAD is defined
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:27:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #735497,
regarding libgcc1: Can switch to use new Allow-Internal-Symbol-Groups for aeabi
symbols
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:24:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #994135,
regarding gcc-9-cross-ports: do not release with bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:25:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #994134,
regarding gcc-9-cross: do not release with bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:25:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #963998,
regarding gcc-9-cross-mipsen: FTBFS: empty variable name
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:25:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #946352,
regarding gcc-9-cross-mipsen_2+c1+b1_i386.changes REJECTED
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:24:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #943487,
regarding libgcc-9-dev-sparc64-cross: (arch:all package) needs binNMU to make
arch:any packages installable
to be marked as d
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:24:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1039525,
regarding gcc-9-cross-ports: Update to autoconf2.69
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:25:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1039482,
regarding gcc-9-cross: Update to autoconf2.69
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:25:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1039526,
regarding gcc-9-cross-mipsen: Update to autoconf2.69
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:25:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032217,
regarding gcc-9-cross: not binNMU-safe
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:24:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076502: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032216,
regarding gcc-9-cross-ports: not binNMU-safe
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:54:57 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1076612: libquadmath0: wrongly assumes that the
storage for __float128 arguments is aligned
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076612,
regarding libquadmath0: wrongly assumes that the storage for __float12
93 matches
Mail list logo
