Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.130
Hi,
gcc-defaults is not binNMU-safe, the reason for this is that
libgcj-common is arch=all, and the dependencies on it from other
packages like libgcj-bc contain the binary epoch. The most easiest fix
for this is to change libgcj-common to arch=any as the
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 4.6.0-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
that g++ and gcj have different versions breaks the build of pdftk,
see e.g.
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=pdftkver=1.41%2Bdfsg-11%2Bb1arch=powerpcstamp=1304254757file=log
If fixing pdftk to just use the default version, it
* Torsten Werner (twer...@debian.org) [100124 14:46]:
I am reassigning the bug to the gcc-4.4 package because the compiler
suggest using -ffunction-sections when that argument is specified on
the command line:
any news on this bug?
I'd appreciate if someone with more hppa / ELF knowledge than
Package: gcc-4.5
Version: 4.5-20100227-1
Architecture: mipsel
Severity: serious
Hi,
this package fails to apply the patches correctly;
Applying patch gcc-ice-hack.diff
patching file src/gcc/Makefile.in
Hunk #1 succeeded at 183 with fuzz 1 (offset 2 lines).
patching file src/gcc/diagnostic.c
Package: gcj-jre-headless
Version: 4:4.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
on all arches we currently have:
LC_ALL=C apt-get -c apt.conf install java-gcj-compat-headless gij
gcj-jre-headless
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080521 12:13]:
that looks ok for now, we can work on the unification of the headers
later.
In case Thiemo agrees (or doesn't disagree) - do you plan to upload it?
Should I NMU it? ...?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth
Hi,
how do we continue here? Is the issue just that the headers are being
moved twice? This bug blocks testing migration of python2.5 and epiphany
which is a precondition for getting gcc-4.3 and gcc-defaults moved.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
at large and all of us. (And one
change is already under consideration at the moment, no need to repeat
such questions.)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unmodified upstream (or
with gcc-snapshot), and add the result to the bug report? What other
qualifications are necessary? Does one need to understand assembler? Or
is being able to compile debian packages and enough time to burn enough?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth
* Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070721 18:51]:
Andreas Barth a écrit :
So, some ideas come to my mind:
1. delay glibc upload until glib transitioned to testing
2. do another upload with shlib bump after glib transitioned to testing,
and wait with gcc to that upload
testing.
He was asked to report back results with a recent gcc-snapshot; did I
miss an answer?
Yes.
http://bugs.debian.org/428582:
| Plain upstream gcc head appears to work, gcc-snapshot fails to build
| with ICE.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
binaries have one).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.GCCMain.compile(ecj1)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.GCCMain.main(ecj1)
I fear this needs some porting work as well, so Ccing [EMAIL PROTECTED] (via
bugs.d.o).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
(future) x.y as goal seems like a good idea to me.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there are such
files inside? (At least Aurelien's way to check doesn't seem too good
to me.)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that
all packages are built using 4.1 or using 3.4 as a fallback. We'll
need the 4.0 source anyway to build libgcc2 on hppa and glibc on the
hurd.
Good. That means that switching alpha to 4.1 would just be nice
anyways.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 18:47]:
* Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-30 10:53]:
the build of qt4-x11 fails on hppa with:
| g++ -c -pipe -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include/freetype2
-I/usr/include/postgresql -g -D_REENTRANT -fvisibility=hidden
-fvisibility
://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=qt4-x11ver=4.1.3-3arch=hppastamp=1151288526file=logas=raw
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 07:37]:
gcc 4.0 and 4.2 work, 4.1 fails.
In this case, I tend to special-case k3d to use 4.0 for now, and replace
that with 4.2 some day.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
overview over the affected packages?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051007 04:42]:
Matthias Klose wrote:
If
you think, that availability of compilers on some architectures
should be release criterium, please bring that up with the release
team first.
That's not at all what I think.
I think that if there
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0-0pre0
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Automatic build of gcc-4.0_4.0-0pre0 on odin by sbuild/sparc 1.170.5
Build started at 20041115-1123
**
Checking available source versions...
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0-0pre0
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
| configure: error: GMP with MPFR support is required to build f95
Automatic build of gcc-4.0_4.0-0pre0 on swawa by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5
Build started at 20041115-1355
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0-0pre0
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
I think this is the main problem
| 2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file libffi/src/mips/ffi.c.rej
| patching file libffi/src/mips/ffitarget.h
| make: *** [stamps/02-patch-stamp-libffi-mips] Error 1
24 matches
Mail list logo
