Re: Bug#845193: dpkg: recent -specs PIE changes break openssl

2016-11-24 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Guillem, 2016-11-24 17:00 GMT+01:00 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : > On 11/24/2016 04:35 PM, Guillem Jover wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:52:33 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >>> clone 845193 -1 >>> reassign -1 dpkg >>> retitle -1 dpkg: please do not add

Bug#843035: gcc-6: --enable-default-pie configuration breaks linking when some libraries are static only

2016-11-06 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Nach, 2016-11-03 19:51 GMT+01:00 NSRT Mail account. : > Hi Balint, > >> Static libraries shipped by Debian are being recompiled with PIE which >> allows linking them to PIE binaries. > > Which is good although a bit of a pain at the moment, since some popular >

Bug#843035: gcc-6: --enable-default-pie configuration breaks linking when some libraries are static only

2016-11-03 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Nach, 2016-11-03 12:06 GMT+01:00 Nach : > Package: gcc-6 > Version: 6.2.0-10 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > GCC 6 in Debian changes linking policy from what was the default in all > previous GCC versions. > Now when attemping to link an executable which

Re: Static libraries - PIC or PIE?

2016-10-31 Thread Bálint Réczey
2016-10-23 16:06 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de>: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:17:06PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Hi Adrian, >> >> 2016-10-23 13:26 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de>: >> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Bálint R

Re: Static libraries - PIC or PIE?

2016-10-23 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Adrian, 2016-10-23 13:26 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de>: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Hi Ardian, > > Hi Bláint, ;-) I'm sorry. :-) > >> 2016-10-23 10:18 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de>: >> >

Re: Static libraries - PIC or PIE?

2016-10-23 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Ardian, 2016-10-23 10:18 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk : > Hi Bálint, > > there is some confusion regarding how static libraries should be > compiled now. > > Your bugs (e.g. #837350) say "Please build libfoo.a with -fPIC". > > Why do these say -fPIC and not -fPIE? I suggest using

Bug#841438: --enable-default-pie breaks kernel build on amd64

2016-10-22 Thread Bálint Réczey
2016-10-22 13:30 GMT+02:00 Gianfranco Costamagna : > Hi > >>Have you tried upstreaming the patch? It would be a great help. > > > I think message 35 would be the right way to go > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841438#35 I think disabling PIE from

Bug#841438: --enable-default-pie breaks kernel build on amd64

2016-10-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
Dear Ubuntu Developers, Have you tried upstreaming the patch? It would be a great help. Cheers, Balint 2016-10-20 19:05 GMT+02:00 Gianfranco Costamagna : > control: severity -1 normal > control: reassign -1 src:linux > control: affects -1 gcc-6 > > Hi Linux Kernel

Bug#835148: Bug#837420: Bug#835148: please do not make GCC incompatible, we have dpkg-buildflags for this! (was Re: Bug#837420: Processed: PIE FTBFS are now RC)

2016-10-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi, 2016-10-22 1:00 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de>: > Bálint Réczey dixit: > >>AFAIK the linux package is the only problematic package were the >>maintainer refused to disable PIE from packaging scripts. > > So, how are you supposed to do that now, ins

Bug#835148: please do not make GCC incompatible, we have dpkg-buildflags for this! (was Re: Bug#837420: Processed: PIE FTBFS are now RC)

2016-10-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Thorsten 2016-10-21 19:11 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Glaser : > Adrian Bunk dixit: > >>gcc-6 6.2.0-7 uploaded to unstable on Tue 18 Oct 2016 defaults to PIE, >>see #835148 for details. > > Oh, thanks. > > This is *so* *totally* the wrong approach, especially as we > have

Bug#841420: --enable-default-pie breaks kernel builds

2016-10-20 Thread Bálint Réczey
Control: reassign -1 linux 4.7.8-1 Control: severity -1 serious Control: tags -1 patch Hi David, 2016-10-20 14:02 GMT+02:00 David Weinehall : > Package: gcc-6 > Severity: important > Version: 6.2.0-7 > > --enable-default-pie (first enabled in gcc-6 6.2.0-7) causes kernel >

Bug#622746: Regression: gcc-4.5 Internal error while rebuilding wireshark_1.5.0-1

2011-04-14 Thread Bálint Réczey
Package: gcc-4.5 Version: 4.5.2-8 Severity: normal Rebuilding wireshark_1.5.0-1 for i386 failed in pbuilder-uml: then mv -f .deps/packet-parlay.Tpo .deps/packet-parlay.Plo; else rm -f .deps/packet-parlay.Tpo; exit 1; fi libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../..