alternate packages like gcc-5-stripped and keeping the
gcc-5-plugin-dev package depending on unstripped cc1plus (so keep gcc-5 and
g++-5 providing unstripped binaries)
Cheers.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8
alternate packages like gcc-5-stripped and keeping the
gcc-5-plugin-dev package depending on unstripped cc1plus.
Cheers.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
, and these are usually not very small
(and have enought disk space).
Cheers
--
Basile Starynkevitchhttp://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
France basile at starynkevitch.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
ii libgmp-dev 2:6.0.0+dfsg-7
gcc-5-plugin-dev recommends no packages.
gcc-5-plugin-dev suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Regards.
--
Basile Starynkevitch http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
France bas...@starynkevitch.net
working on http://gcc-melt.org
and
implemented inside cc1 ?
(Unless you don't strip the dynamic symbols linked with -rdynamic when building
cc1)
Regards.
--
Basile Starynkevitch http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
France
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
://git.hadrons.org/cgit/debian/gcc-on-diet.git/
in case others find it useful. And I guess I could create a package
repository for it, if there's demand.
Don't do that. If you strip cc1 cc1plus (etc...) you cannot have GCC
plugins.
Regards
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net
instruction after `rep'
I think it is a compiler`s issue.
Yes. The compiler emits rep; ret (or perhaps rep ret) and the recent
binutils are not happy with that.
see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2011-03/msg00286.html
Cheers
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email
Hello All,
It would be very nice, for GCC plugin developers,
to have a gcc-4.7-dbg package which would provide the debugging variant of gcc,
cc1, cc1plus
What do you think about that?
Cheers
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email
plugin failures also trigger it.
I suggest to replace it with
The bug is not reproducible, so it could be a plugin, hardware or OS problem
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basileatstarynkevitchdotnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:49:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 24.09.2012 13:27, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
Hello All,
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-09/msg00232.html for details about my
suggestion.
The message
The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:10:50PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
Ok, to say it in other words:
experimentally, a plugin which calls fatal_error (and this is definitely
an
acceptable behavior for plugins) makes
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:35:54PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 24.09.2012 16:24, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:10:50PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
Ok, to say it in other words
are the -dbg variants of debian packages made)
Cheers
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basileatstarynkevitchdotnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mine, sont seulement les miennes
ppl_read_polyhedron_matrix
00ad9500 T ppl_set_coef_gmp
00ad9450 T ppl_set_inhomogeneous_gmp
00ad9750 T ppl_strip_loop
Why not use libppl.so.9 in cc1?
Cheers
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basileatstarynkevitchdotnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la
-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.1 20110421 (prerelease) (Debian 4.6.0-5)
% gcc -O3 -c preprocessed.i
## succeeded
So you could try using gcc-4.6
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email
appropriate place.
By the way, I am interested: how is gengttype installed in the
gcc-4.6-plugin-dev package? I am the GCC (upstream) guy who improved
gengtype, and as far as I know the gcc/Makefile.in rule to install it was
missing in (GCC FSF) 4.6.0...
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http
!
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basileatstarynkevitchdotnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
Basile Starynkevitch wrote in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2010/03/msg00047.html
Now, one of the issues about MELT Debian packaging is the fact that
melt-runtime.c (the source of melt.so plugin) uses GTY
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Type-Information.html#Type-Information
Matthias Klose wrote:
[posted on both gcc@ debian-gcc@ lists]
On 14.03.2010 13:15, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-03/msg00129.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-03/msg00132.html - for those new to MELT see
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki
.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basileatstarynkevitchdotnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
Debian to package it.
Comments are welcome (but beware that I Basile am not very familiar with
Debian packaging, and even that I am still scared by the complexity of
GCC building procedures, notably Makefile.in configure.ac files).
Thanks for reading.
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21 matches
Mail list logo
