Bug#420758: Acknowledgement (Does not match libstdc++6-dbg)

2007-05-19 Thread Carlo Wood
by 0x40007B6: (within /lib/ld-2.3.6.so) ==22446== Address 0x1D6 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd This seems like a very easy fix, has nobody looked at it yet please? It's highly annoying that libstdc++ doesn't have debug symbols. -- Carlo Wood <[EMAIL

Bug#420758: Does not match libstdc++6-dbg

2007-04-24 Thread Carlo Wood
Package: libstdc++6 Version: 4.1.1-21 Severity: normal The package libstdc++6 contains the library /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.8 I need debugging symbols for this package, so I have also installed the package libstdc++6-dbg Currently, the pacakge libstdc++6-dbg contains the file /usr/lib/debug/li

Re: [3.3 branch] 2 missing symbols in libstdc++ baseline

2003-04-29 Thread Carlo Wood
:basic_streambuf >*) > _ZNSt9basic_iosIcSt11char_traitsIcEE4initEPSt15basic_streambufIcS1_E > GLIBCPP_3.2 > > 2 > std::basic_ios > >::init(std::basic_streambuf >*) > _ZNSt9basic_iosIwSt11char_traitsIwEE4initEPSt15basic_streambufIwS1_E > GLIBCPP_3.2 > > 0 incompatible symbols > make[2]: Leaving directory > `/build/packages/gcc/3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds7/build/i386-linux/libstdc++-v3' -- Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: preprocessor/2883: cpp stringizing problem 1

2001-05-20 Thread Carlo Wood
#x) A string literal can't form a new preprocessing token by catenation with another. This warning is correct. Instead you should write: #define ASM_NAME(x) __asm__("_" #x) -- Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: preprocessor/2882: code inside "#if 0" generates warnings with -pedantic

2001-05-20 Thread Carlo Wood
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 08:39:40PM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > bug01.c:10:1: C++ style comments are not allowed in ISO C89 ... > #if 0 > // int bar =3D 1; > #endif Comments are processed before control lines. I don't see why this would be a bug. -- Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>