] Error 77
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch gave error exit status 2
It would be nice if we could get an update to gcc-defaults in
experimental as well.
--
Daniel Schepler
Source: gnat-4.9
Version: 4.9.1-4
Severity: serious
The Build-Depends for gnat-4.9 cannot be satisfied in current unstable because
they include gcc-4.9-source ( 4.9.2).
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
; resolve dependencies ; \
apt-get check dpkg --configure -a
Finally, full build of eglibc (with libssp usage compiled into the
appropriate utilities):
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=? [nocheck] dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
for an example of a failed build.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3128912.nBIJ1MDust@frobozz
: unmounting dev/pts filesystem
I: unmounting run/shm filesystem
I: unmounting proc filesystem
I: cleaning the build env
I: removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//16526 and its subdirectories
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
version for the
bootstrapped pkg-config to link against -- which still requires libffi.
And hopefully the chain above also explains why texinfo isn't available to be
bootstrapped yet at this point.)
--
Daniel Schepler
diff -urN libffi-3.0.13.old/debian/rules libffi-3.0.13/debian/rules
--- libffi
.)
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cadf0c47m4wjnsi7xxfoxx--wjopskt7ao+paoc8cw3mvx2_...@mail.gmail.com
-directory, and I didn't immediately
see anything in the 4.7.2-19 changelog that would address this. So I
just wanted to let you know about this.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Source: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.120
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: port-x32 ftbfs-x32
Here's the patch I'm using to add x32 support to gcc-defaults.
--
Daniel Schepler
diff -Nru gcc-defaults-1.120/debian/changelog gcc-defaults-1.120+x32/debian/changelog
--- gcc
, actually, I forgot I got multiple messages, and forwarded the one
for gcc-4_6-branch; but the logs for gcc-4_7-branch and trunk look
pretty much the same.)
--
Daniel Schepler
-- Forwarded message --
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
Date: Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5
. So I guess I'll just start working
on adding libc6-x32 and libx32gcc1 packages to the existing structure.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http
releases, of course): With the current situation, anyone who needs
both multiarch libraries and gcc-multilib will necessarily end up with
two copies of 32-bit [e]glibc on their system, libc6-i386 and
libc6:i386. That seems like needless duplication in a fairly common
situation.
--
Daniel Schepler
/x32 architectures with
it. I'm also pretty sure I've missed most places where I'd need to
add x32 multilib support, so it will need more work before it will
build properly on amd64 or i386.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
On 17.08.2012 18:12, Daniel Schepler wrote:
On a side note, instead of adding libx32gcc1 etc.,
I don't like the idea of having to cros-build-depend on other architectures,
so
as a first step, I'd like to see these packages built.
Neither do I -- but I
programs
that sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long).
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CADf0C44cgaEXLz213p9Q+c=34fB0Cm6M6mpMOar7vP6=yye
s_isnan.i still fails to build with gcc-4.7 4.7.1-3. I just tried
with gcc-snapshot 20120704-1, and it fails there too.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
How does 4.7.1-2 do?
Curious,
Jonathan
Still fails.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Source: libffi
Version: 3.0.10-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi, the current 3.0.10 Debian package builds a broken libffi library on x32,
whereas on 3.0.11 it passes the testsuite with no problems. (Although it
would require an soname bump to libffi6.)
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cadf0c47xbrnqkuu1597_pjmaaamynxq4kx4xz-www0edm-6...@mail.gmail.com
not satisfy build-dependency.
E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.
...
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201110301335.35913.dschep...@gmail.com
-stamp-libffi-backport] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
as it Build-Depends on both classpath-
common and default-jdk-builddep (at least on !alpha).
Wouldn't it make sense to handle this as an alternative, since gcj uses
classpath libraries anyway?
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
, as in #536826.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
); \
//} while(0)
int test() {
// doit(3);
return 5;
}
dan...@frobozz:/tmp$ g++ -c -Wall test.cc
test.cc:1:1: warning: multi-line comment
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
The problem is that neither gcj, gcj-jdk, nor java-gcj-compat-dev depends on
gcj-4.3 anymore. An apt-get install default-jdk-builddep gcj-4.3 works fine
in a chroot. So it should be enough just to add gcj-4.3 as a dependency of
one of those packages.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
).
However, with that fixed, I still get the /usr/bin/gcj not found error in
numerous packages, including db{,4.5,4.6} and libjaxp1.3-java.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
symlink as its default.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
'
make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: gnat-4.3
Version: 4.3.2-1.1
Severity: serious
I cannot build gnat-4.3 under pbuilder (in sid) because the package Build-
Depends on gcc-4.3-source ( 4.3.3) but the current version of gcc-4.3-
source is 4.3.3-3.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
status 2
The config.log file shows that it's detecting that gnatgcc doesn't exist. So
it appears that gnat-4.3 by itself is insufficient to build the package.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
call and it would handle all that automatically.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I forgot to mention I also need to create multiarch.inc by hand, according to
the code in the gcc-4.3 source package, which is tedious and error-prone.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 06:48:54 am Matthias Klose wrote:
tag 453072 + moreinfo
thanks
please recheck with gcj-4.3.
That's going to be difficult, since glibc has a patch applied to work around
the bug.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
.
--
Daniel Schepler
/i486-linux-gnu/libgomp'
make[3]: *** [all-target-libgomp] Error 2
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
I can also reproduce this on amd64 using pbuilder.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of libgcj-bc, and then complaining
that libgcj8-1 doesn't have the requisite shlibs entry.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to over 4G
virtual memory before I had to kill it.
Cc to debian-glibc because as I recall, the bug was previously worked around
in glibc, but it seems not to be any more since version 2.7-1.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Recommends in gcc-4.1, it is currently impossible
to satisfy the Recommends for both gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.2 simultaneously, which
would conflict with the (proposed?) release goal of making all Recommends
satisfiable within main.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 11:22:13 am Matthias Klose wrote:
Daniel Schepler writes:
It looks like the original bug message didn't get forwarded to
debian-gcc, possibly because it included a large preprocessed source
file. So I'm sending this followup to call attention to the bug report
(and I don't actually know whether it ever finishes), where
g++-4.1 takes under 2 minutes.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to 'sum(std::vectorint,
std::allocatorint )'
frobnitz:/tmp# /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c test.cc
test.cc: In function 'int test()':
test.cc:12: error: no matching function for call to 'sum(std::vectorint,
std::allocatorint )'
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
on further reflection it's not quite clear whether this should work.
However, it does work with g++-4.1 but not with g++-4.2 or gcc-snapshot.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gnat
Version: 4.2.0-0
Severity: normal
As the subject says: the version of gnat from experimental Depends on
gnat-4.2, which is nowhere to be found, not even in NEW as far as I can tell.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
() {
Aint y;
return f(y);
}
This code compiles with g++-4.1, but fails with g++-4.2 and the snapshot of
g++-4.3 currently in Debian's gcc-snapshot package. My question is: is this
valid code or not?
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
that it
causes zlib to FTBFS because zlib's configure script is badly behaved and
treats any output as an error. I was wondering whether you might know what's
causing this message.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0
make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20070515'
make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2
--
Daniel Schepler
it automatically from the
clean, build, or binary targets. Fixing this would also allow you to drop
the self-Build-Depends on cpp-2.95, incidentally.)
--
Daniel Schepler
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
en_US.UTF-8)
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
-- Orson Scott Card
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I found the cause of this error: for some reason the global destructor
for idl_filename is being called twice. I've attached a small test
case which trips the same bug; when compiled with g++-3.3, it produces
no output, but when compiled with g++-3.4, it outputs an error
message.
--
Daniel
-3.3.3ds7'
make: *** [binary] Error 2
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
-- Orson Scott Card
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ok, better to move the second make behind the if dot ...
Yes, after making that change the package appeared to build fine.
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet
2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc11:3.3.3-6 GCC support library
-- no debconf information
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet
/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had
Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc11:3.3.3-6 GCC support library
-- no debconf information
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had
-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc11:3.3.3-0pre0 GCC support library
-- no debconf information
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
-- Orson Scott Card
: Linux frobnitz 2.6.0-test7 #1 Sun Oct 12 16:59:56 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
-- Orson Scott Card
frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
-- Orson Scott Card
, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages gcc-3.3-doc depends on:
ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3-2The GNU Compiler Collection (base
-- no debconf information
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet
I just tested this with gcc-snapshot (version 20030314-1), and the
problem compiling blas still seems to exist there.
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
-- Orson Scott Card
Whoops, forgot to Cc this to the bug report...
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel Schepler writes:
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 3.0.4ds3-13
Severity: serious
When I try to build gcc-3.0 on unstable, first there are bison errors
in java-parse.y.
please could you send me
: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2
Unfortunately, at least one package (gconf2) build-depends on
gcc-3.0.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux frobnitz 2.4.19 #2 Sun Aug 18 15:52:57 PDT 2002 i686
unknown unknown GNU/Linux
--
Daniel Schepler Please
62 matches
Mail list logo
