On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:52:55PM +0100, Romain Failliot wrote:
} Hi!
}
} I've got interested in the D language since the C++ language is
} becoming worse and worse in front of the C# and Java ones. But C++ is
} the only C-style syntax language that doesn't have to run above a
} virtual machine.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:31:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
} Are there any plans how handle the next C++ transition, and when to
} start it?
Is there one on the horizon? I thought the 3.x series was maintaining
binary compatibility throughout.
--Greg
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:30:00PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
} [EMAIL PROTECTED] removed; no bug was added to the gcc database,
} since the email was malformed]
}
} On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:32:09PM -0400, Matteo Frigo wrote:
} > >Description:
} >
} > It would be nice if this function issued a
Daniel Jacobowitz sez:
} On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:48:25PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
} > Daniel Jacobowitz sez:
} > } On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
[...]
} > } > I don't understand why my program seems to be linked to two versions of
} &g
Joel Baker sez:
[...]
} Er. Are any of the libraries you depend on linked against the old libstdc++
} (say, if any of *them* are C++ libraries, and haven't been recompiled with
} GCC 3.2 - this being the whole situation that leads to the requirement for
} juggling things carefully in the GCC versio
Daniel Jacobowitz sez:
} On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
} > I am developing a program using g++ 3.2. When I added a dynamic_cast, it
} > started segfaulting on it. In searching the web I came up with the
} > following:
} >
} > http://lists.debian
I am developing a program using g++ 3.2. When I added a dynamic_cast, it
started segfaulting on it. In searching the web I came up with the
following:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2002/debian-gcc-200205/msg00240.html
It suggests that I mght be linking against two different versions of
libst
7 matches
Mail list logo
