Followup-For: Bug #1005863
Control: affects -1 = sudo
Followup-For: Bug #1005863
X-Debbugs-Cc: ballo...@debian.org
Control: reassign -1 binutils 2.38-1
Reassigning this from package 'gcc' to 'binutils':
It looks like it is GNU binutils[1] (and in particular, the GNU assembler)
that is responsible for producing the assembly opcodes for a binary
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 07:22, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 11:47:21PM +, James Addison wrote:
> > Would it be fair to raise the severity of this bug to a release-critical
> > level?
>
> No, it would be fair to remove Geode LX from the set of suppor
Package: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1005863
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org, debian-rele...@lists.debian.org,
debian-pol...@lists.debian.org
Hi folks,
Bug #1005863 describes a gcc-11 behaviour that results in software that exits
ungracefully on Geode LX i686 hardware. Despite
Package: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1005863
X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi
> So my guess is that approximately 6-7% of i386 packages in bookworm _that
> contain binaries or shared libraries_ are susceptible to this bug.
...
> It's also a larger number of packages than we could expect
Package: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1005863
X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi
Ok; I should have realised that scanning the entire contents of the i386
bookworm archive for particular opcodes across _all_ files on a single machine
seemed to complete surprisingly quickly..
Please find
Package: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1005863
X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi
Control: affects -1 + sudo
> That's three potential positives; in total, the check ran on approximately
> thirty-two thousand (32340, to be more precise) packages.
My apologies: there was a bug in the script to
Package: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1005863
X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi
Control: affects -1 - sudo net-tools
Control: affects -1 + libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18
Control: affects -1 + gobjc++-12-x86-64-linux-gnu
Control: affects -1 + libfsapfs-dev
Dear Maintainer and Martin-Éric,
Using a
Package: gcc-10
Version: 10.4.0-7
Followup-For: Bug #1023666
Bug #1004184 implies that gcc-11 cannot build correct mips64 code for a key
Debian package (source: matplotlib) without buildflag adjustments. However,
gcc-10 does emit correct code for the same package and architecture.
Should that
Source: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1004184
X-Debbugs-Cc: frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104914
Hi Frederic: I'm linking a forwarded GCC GNU bug report that I _think_ is the
upstream report matching this bug. I found
10 matches
Mail list logo
