Package: gcc-snapshot
Hi!
Installing the `gcc-snapshot` binary package, there's README.Debian
(in the source package, this is README.snapshot), which (in two
places) shows how to assign LD_LIBRARY_PATH (and PATH) extended values
to allow to use the snapshot compiler.
These two assignments are
Hi!
After poking around, I guess this is actually a glibc issue and it's
probably already fixed by this commit:
jbglaw@lili:/var/cache/git/glibc$ git show
3e5760fcb48528d48deeb60cb885a97bb731160c | head -20
commit 3e5760fcb48528d48deeb60cb885a97bb731160c
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Wed Sep 28
more detailed information about why it failed.
Also, keep in mind that sin.sin_port = 5786 is probably not what you
want, think of network byte order! Sparc and PPC are big endian and I
guess that amd64 is little endian.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de +49-172
= INADDR_ANY;
printf (sin len %d\n,len);
socket_fd = socket (AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0);
res = bind (socket_fd, (struct sockaddr *) sin, len);
printf (res = %d, errno = %s\n, res, strerror (res? errno: 0));
return 0;
}
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg
.)
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481 _ O _
Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH
On Wed, 2003-08-06 23:08:22 +0200, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
i386 seems to die, sun4m also does have servere problems... Where does
this lead to? All these seem to arise from doing optimization which
hasn't been proved
.
We only require a coprocessor, but anything i586 doesn't make much sense
at all at this stage. So no problem on our side.
so make -mcpu=i586 -mtune=i686 the default? anything else as the default?
-mcpu=i386 -mtune=i486, at least for Linux based targets:-)
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict
On Thu, 2003-08-07 00:48:04 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:43:35AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-06 23:08:22 +0200, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jan-Benedict
On Wed, 2003-08-06 17:22:19 -0400, Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:08:22PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
Someone is making statements without knowing the real situation.
Changing to hwmul ops in libc
On Wed, 2003-08-06 15:52:31 -0400, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jan-Benedict Glaw said:
...and up to now, I haven't seen real hard numbers that show that
optimizing for i486 does really make anything noticeable faster. From
I've given such numbers
On Thu, 2003-08-07 07:58:01 +0200, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am I wrong or did we, forced because we wanted to be binary compatible
to some major distributions, just follow others and doing optimization
On Thu, 2003-08-07 08:34:37 +0200, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
Would Debian accept two ix86 distributions? One i386 and, say, i[56]86?
No, unless you can explain why you need to run KDE, eclipse and
openoffice on an i386
that often. Please don't cut their update pathes...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger | im Internet! | im Irak!
ret = do_actions
On Wed, 2003-08-06 20:11:32 +0200, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having a broken libstdc++ is already bad enough. Please, please please
please please don't make it worse as it's already today. I heared
14 matches
Mail list logo
