Bug#225186: Acknowledgement (g++-3.3: error compiling max value for a long long)

2003-12-27 Thread Jim Watson
This was fixed by adding LL after the constant values. sorry about the inconvenience, i guess it is invalid thanks jim

Bug#225186: g++-3.3: error compiling max value for a long long

2003-12-26 Thread Jim Watson
Package: g++-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-4 Severity: normal Tags: sid -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: sparc Kernel: Linux sun 2.4.18 #1 SMP Mon Jan 27 14:07:39 EST 2003 sparc64 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages g++-3.3 depends on: ii

Bug#205548: acknowledged by developer (fixed in binutils 2.14.90.0.6-2)

2003-09-27 Thread Jim Watson
This is fixed works now binutils 2.14.90.0.6-3 for my openoffice build, many thanks jim

Bug#205548: acknowledged by developer (fixed in binutils 2.14.90.0.6-2)

2003-09-22 Thread Jim Watson
I still got this problem on debian/unstable linux sparc with binutils 2.14.90.0.6-2 Can you confirm this is the correct ld version in that package as it looks 4 weeks ago but the bug only fixed this week? sun:/home/jim# ld --version GNU ld version 2.14.90.0.6 20030820 Debian GNU/Linux On Sun,

Bug#205548: gcc-3.3: linking fails for large shared libaries

2003-09-02 Thread Jim Watson
Thanks Chris i got that backtrace too.. from module sc == Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x7006157c in bfd_elf64_archive_write_armap () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so (gdb) where #0 0x7006157c in bfd_elf64_archive_write_armap () from

Bug#205548: gcc-3.3: linking fails for large shared libaries

2003-08-15 Thread Jim Watson
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:59, Matthias Klose wrote: Is oo built with the jdk1.4? yes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/oo_src/instsetoo$ java -version java version 1.4.1 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build Blackdown-1.4.1-01) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.4.1-01, mixed

Bug#205548: gcc-3.3: linking fails for large shared libaries

2003-08-15 Thread Jim Watson
Hi, On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:59, Matthias Klose wrote: ld is not stripped, so you could get a stacktrace. sorry but i will need someone to tell me how to do this. I can change the makefiles and I know how i can copy this command line from the log into a shell file and make it run, but i do