On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:29:27AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Well, for upstream support there is: at the bottom of the page. According
to doko sparc32 code generation is unmaintained upstream, and he doesn't
want to step up to maintain it any longer.
Well, that is no less of a problem than
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 02:20:51AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.12.2009 01:09, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:06:42AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
- which gcc version/package was used to build this version?
https://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=maildroparch=arm ?
I
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:06:42AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
- which gcc version/package was used to build this version?
https://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=maildroparch=arm ?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:50:21PM +, Paul Saunders wrote:
Package: maildrop
Version: 2.2.0-3
Severity: important
The tolower() and toupper() function calls in the mailfilter always
return empty results.
Recompiling recipenode.C with -O1 option for gcc instead of -O2 returns
these
severity 211909 important
tag 211909 sarge
tag 211909 sid
thanks
madison says:
libgcj-common | 1:3.3.1-0pre0 | testing | alpha, arm, i386, ia64, m68k,
powerpc, s390, sparc
libgcj-common | 1:3.3.2-0pre3 | unstable | alpha, arm, ia64, m68k,
powerpc, s390, sparc
libgcj-common |
Hi,
I also think that the manual pages shipped in the cpp package are pointless
and wrong. If the FSF is actually trying to force us to ship licenses and
RMS rants as _manual pages_, I say to hell with that.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 10:30:43AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
What does objdump -p say for those two files?
They are missing the CXXABI_* mark as the lintian info suggests, but I
don't know why that would be the case.
$ objdump -p /usr/lib/libpspell.so.15.0.2
7 matches
Mail list logo
