Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4

2003-01-31 Thread Mark Mitchell
them worry. Both perspectives are correct: they should worry, but not *too* much. -- Mark Mitchell[EMAIL PROTECTED] CodeSourcery, LLChttp://www.codesourcery.com

Re: [3.2] Reconsider patches for bison 1.50?

2002-10-21 Thread Mark Mitchell
I think we should reconsider not backporting the patches for bison 1.50 to the 3.2 branch. OK; let's reconsider. Please point me at the patches. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell[EMAIL PROTECTED] CodeSourcery, LLChttp://www.codesourcery.com

Re: [3.2] Reconsider patches for bison 1.50?

2002-10-21 Thread Mark Mitchell
--On Monday, October 21, 2002 10:18:06 AM +0200 Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Mitchell writes: I think we should reconsider not backporting the patches for bison 1.50 to the 3.2 branch. OK; let's reconsider. Please point me at the patches. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches