Package: g++-5-arm-linux-gnueabihf
Version: 5.2.1-16cross1
The compiler calls the linker (binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf 2.25.1-2)
in a way that makes it fail:
arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++-5 test.cxx -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++-5
Package: libstdc++-4.8-dev
Version: 4.8.2-1
See upstream bug report for details:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59548
There you'll find a bug fix patch. Please merge for the next Debian
revision, just in case upstream hasn't emitted a bug fix release yet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
This diff in Debian revision 4.8.2-8 appears to fix the issue:
--- /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/stl_algo.h2013-10-17 17:27:51.0
+0200
+++ /srv/chroot/experimental/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/stl_algo.h
2013-12-04 02:06:03.0 +0100
@@ -2279,7 +2279,7 @@
Package: libstdc++-4.8-dev
Version: 4.8.2-1
Severity: important
Demo exploit:
#include algorithm
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
static int data[] = {3,5,4,1,0,2};
std::nth_element(data + 0, data + 3, data + 6, std::lessint());
}
Crashes:
g++ -std=c++11 test.cxx ./a.out
Package: libffi5
Version: 3.0.10-3+b1
woodpecker:~# aptitude install libsamplerate0-dev:armhf
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libffi5:armhf{ab} libglib2.0-0:armhf{a} libpcre3:armhf{a} libpopt0:armhf{a}
libsamplerate0:armhf{a} libsamplerate0-dev:armhf
libselinux1:armhf{a}
I can confirm this, same here on SID amd64.
Cheers,
Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ok. Seems that bug is fixed in experimental. Two questions.
1) Will this version be uploaded to unstable and then to testing
before lenny is released?
2) According to Ben, any library on SPARC is a subject to this bug. I
think it is rather hard to create a list of libraries which have
functions
be some kind of regression.
Regards,
Max
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21.1
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
This is the offending line in the assembler code produced by gcc-4.2:
leal -1(%esi),20(%esp)
It indeed contains too many memory references.
Regards,
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
adding the ability to build eCos
cross-gcc packages, do I have any chances that you include it into the
main line.
PS: Please, include me on the CC-list when you answer this message.
--
Max Dmitrichenko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: libgcj7-dbg
Version: 4.1.1-13
Severity: serious
None of the binaries below /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin is executable:
-rw-r--r-- root/root 8421 2006-09-08 16:03:23
./usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/gij-4.1
-rw-r--r-- root/root 71536 2006-09-08 16:03:23
./usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/gcj-dbtool-4.1
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.51-1
Tags: FTBFS
Severity: minor
gcj-4.0 -C -d . -I . sun/rmi/rmic/Main.java
make[1]: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/share/java/com-sun-javadoc-0.7.7.jar', needed by
`com/sun/tools/doclets/Taglet.class'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory
strace output:
[pid 16630] open(/usr/share/java/libgcj-4.0.3.jar, O_RDONLY) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
gcj looks for 4.0.3, but there is only 4.0.2 (symlink missing?):
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9710666 Oct 2 07:25
/usr/share/java/libgcj-4.0.2.jar
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Oct
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 02:15:11PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 01:27:43PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can reproduce the problem in paer's sid chroot (hppa) and have put
gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 builds with -save-temps on [1
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:29:38PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
I've been able to find a reduced testcase that shows the problem.
can find below the results using gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 with -O1/-O2 each.
The problem only shows with gcc-4.0 and -O2 on hppa.
In case this helps analyze the problem
.
http://people.debian.org/~xam/aespipe/hppa/
cheers,
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 01:27:43PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can reproduce the problem in paer's sid chroot (hppa) and have put
gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 builds with -save-temps on [1]. If there is
other information that could be useful to you, please
Breitling Mart
http://submissions.xi4.net/rep/vron/scoop.html
Circuit City - Rolex Replicas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey it's weird, my friend Sara told me today by
phone that she tryed to email me but she couldn't
for some reason... I'm tired of this computer stuff,
never works :/ I don't know if you ever got my messages
now, so I don't know if you like me or not... I updated
my website recently with few
19 matches
Mail list logo
