Best online discount
www.sleaford-alivia2010.narod.ru
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
n another computer and it
worked fine.
Please close this bug report.
Thanks
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-4.0
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hello,
I am trying to compile gcc-4.0 on Ubuntu, so I can recompile the
latest openoffice.org2 package.
However, I get different errors each time. I don't think these are ubuntu
specific. If you consider this the wron
Package: gnat-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre3
Severity: normal
As far as I can tell, this program is valid. It runs fine under
gnat 3.14p-3 in fact:
--- cut ---
[517] [snoopy:bam] ~/tmp/ada/bugs >cat test_calendar.adb
with Ada.Calendar;
use Ada.Calendar;
procedure Test_Calendar is
T : Time;
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 04:31:18PM -0700, Dara Hazeghi wrote:
> the final note in the Debian bug trail for this bug noted that this
> problem was fixed on gcc 3.3 branch. Is this the case? Right now,
> mainline and 3.3 branch produce this for me:
>
> -7.07105E-01
> 0.0E
tell me. Is there a simple solution out there ??? please
> tell me. DS
Create interfaces to the C-functions?
Use gnat 3.14?
Sorry, these are the only two solutions I know of (not tested the first
one myself).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 18:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
> From gcc.gnu.org: "please note that the integration of the Ada front
> end is still work in progress."
Just curious, where does it say that? I looked at
http://gcc.gnu.org/>, and couldn't find it.
--
Brian May <
ion then in 3.1 based
version?
(I have found 3 bugs total, 2 exist in the old version and 2 exist in
the new version).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> or use the attached bts2gcc and the modified gccbug.
Thanks for this. I have forwarded bug reports for both the bugs which
exist in Gnat-3.1.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 10:37, Brian May wrote:
> It looks OK, but all it does is copy the input to the output (aux was
> created by renaming ada.numerics.aux to aux):
On second thoughts, no it doesn't!
(Dislaimer: I don't really know what these opcodes stand for, so I am
guessi
%eax, -88(%ebp)
movl%edx, -84(%ebp)
movl%ecx, -80(%ebp)
fldt-88(%ebp)
leave
ret
>
> Sam
>
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aybe there is a
problem passing parameters.
However, when I copied the routine to my code, it instantly stopped
working at all (it turned the Asm call into a NOP), and I half suspected
at the time that maybe I was doing something wrong (do I need to use a
special compiler flag or something to get As
the upstream address?
I can see /usr/doc/gnat-3.1/README.Bugs.gz, but that looks like it is
mainly for C++, not Ada.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gnat-3.1
Version: 1:3.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #148529
The following code is the same as before, except with 2 extra lines:
--- CUT ---
with Ada.Text_IO;
use Ada.Text_IO;
with Ada.Numerics;
use Ada.Numerics;
with Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions;
procedure TestBug2 is
typ
Package: gnat-3.1
Version: 1:3.1-2
Severity: normal
With the following code:
---CUT---
with Ada.Text_IO;
use Ada.Text_IO;
with Ada.Numerics;
use Ada.Numerics;
with Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions;
procedure TestBug2 is
type F is new Float;
subtype Radians is F;
package
postinst calls
Daniel> install-info, which is written in perl, that's all.
You might be right here, although the problem seems to be in libdb2
not libdb3. libdb3 isn't required at this point yet.
Reassigning the bug to libdb2.
Daniel> Mostly, I think that the shlibs file for libc6 needs
Daniel> bumped!
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: libstdc++2.10-dev
Version: 1:2.95.2-13
Severity: grave
Preparing to replace libstdc++2.10-dev 1:2.95.2-13 (using
.../libstdc++2.10-dev_1%3a2.95.4-0.010424_i386.deb) ...
perl: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2' not found (required by
/lib/libdb.so.3)
dpkg: warning - old pre-removal scri
17 matches
Mail list logo
