On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:27:43AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Michael!
>
> On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 20:25 +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 09:38:56AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > After a long discussion on IRC and t
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 09:38:56AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> After a long discussion on IRC and the mailing list, we have agreed to raise
> the
> baseline for the alpha architecture to EV56 to improve the generated code and
> fix
> a number of issues. The change is already being
Source: gcc-4.8
Version: 4.8.2-10
Severity: important
Justification: floating point exceptions observed in packages built with
gcc-4.8
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
Please default the gcc-4.8 compiler suite to have the option -mieee turned
on on Alpha. This was the default
the
toolchain
for this port. This is the current status, please correct me if I'm wrong.
- alpha, no feedback, CCing Michael Cree.
I had hoped to get glibc 2.17 building on Alpha before switching to gcc-4.8, but
that's proving to be a rather difficult nut to crack. Assuming that there is
nothing
Source: gcc-4.7
Version: 4.7.3-6
Severity: normal
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
gcc-4.7 FTBFS on Alpha due to the infamous linker relaxation problem. It is
easily worked around by linking with --no-relax. The same fix that was
applied to gcc-4.8 for Alpha will work here,
Source: gcc-4.8
Version: 4.8-20130127-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
gcc-4.8 in experimental FTBFS on alpha due to linker relocation overflow
errors. Build log at:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:56:18AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 29.01.2013 09:30, schrieb Michael Cree:
should enable gcc-4.8 to build on Alpha.
please could you check if the build does succeed with this patch?
Yep, no probs. For the test I used:
ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_TARGET_ARCH
Source: gnat-4.6
Version: 4.6.3-5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
gnat-4.6 FTBFS on Alpha with GPREL16 relocation truncation errors in the
link of gnat1 during stage 1 compilation. Full build log is at:
On 16/07/12 21:27, Michael Cree wrote:
gcc-4.5 FTBFS on alpha with GPREL16 relocation truncation errors in the
link of cc1-dummy during stage 1 compilation. Full build log is at:
Ha, ha, I see I added the patch tag to the bug report but no patch :-/
Adding the following in debian/rules2
Source: gcc-4.5
Version: 4.5.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Justification: Fails to build from source but built in the past.
gcc-4.5 FTBFS on alpha with GPREL16 relocation truncation errors in the
Source: gcc-4.7
Version: 4.7.0-4
Severity: Important
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
gcc-4.7 FTBFS on Alpha with the following error:
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/./gcc/
-B/usr/alpha-linux-gnu/bin/
Fixed in gcc-4.6 version 4.6.2-13. Both git and libarchive, which
previously FTBFS because of this bug, now compile and their test suites
pass. Feel free to close the bug report.
Cheers
Michael.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On 12/01/12 10:56, Michael Cree wrote:
Package: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.2-11
git_1:1.7.8.3-1 FTBFS because of incorrect code generation by gcc-4.6.
This is now PR 51994.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994
Cheers
Michael.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
Package: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.2-11
Severity: important
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
git_1:1.7.8.3-1 FTBFS because of incorrect code generation by gcc-4.6.
The test suite of git fails with a segmentation violation as revealed by
Source: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.109
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
Please default to gcc-4.6 on the Alpha architecture.
Thanks,
Michael Cree.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On 22/03/11 01:31, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.03.2011 13:19, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-4.6suite=experimental
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/opts.o differs
make[4]: ***
On 21/03/11 04:16, Matthias Klose wrote:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-snapshot
fails to build with a link error.
That's the GPREL16 relocation truncation error which is reputedly due to
a bug in the linker optimiser. Linking with -Wl,--no-relax resolves
those
On 06/12/09 23:21, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:18:47AM -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Michael Creemc...@orcon.net.nz wrote:
On 18/11/2009, at 9:31 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.4-5
Hi,
I recently started seeing several
On 18/11/2009, at 9:31 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.4-5
Hi,
I recently started seeing several cases of gcc giving an error
message like this:
packet-l2tp.c:1680: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 419 86 84 9 packet-l2tp.c:1585 (set (reg:DI 200)
(ne:SI (reg:DI 76
On 02/12/09 18:18, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Michael Creemc...@orcon.net.nz wrote:
On 18/11/2009, at 9:31 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.4-5
Hi,
I recently started seeing several cases of gcc giving an error
message like this:
20 matches
Mail list logo
