Re: how to find symbols needed for libgcc-compat in glibc

2002-10-12 Thread Michael Fedrowitz
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 02:58:44PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: Hi, I'm not sure. I know I was told that hppa was okay. Also from my conversations with Jakub it appears i386, ia-64, alpha and sparc32 should be fine. So I would suggest we focus on checking the status of arm, hurd-i386,

Bug#118754: gcc-2.95 doesn't build chill on m68k anymore

2001-11-08 Thread Michael Fedrowitz
Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 2.95.4.ds6-0.011006 Severity: normal Hi, some time ago gcc-2.95 stopped building chill on m68k for no apparent reason (can't find anything in the changelog). chill has always built fine on m68k, and still does, so I don't really see a reason to disable it. Anyway, if

Bug#106538: version numbering broken

2001-07-25 Thread Michael Fedrowitz
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 3.0.1.ds0-0pre010723 Severity: normal Hi, the version numbering of the source package of gcc-3.0 is broken: 3.0.ds9-4 3.0.1.ds0-0pre010723 (because d 1). This greatly confuses the buildds. -Michael

Re: Installed gcc-defaults 0.8 (i386 source)

2001-05-28 Thread Michael Fedrowitz
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 15:01:13 -0400, Matthias Klose wrote: * Update version number to 2.95.4 (except m68k). ^^^ Why? gcc-2.95 is currently at 2.95.4.ds1-0.010506 on m68k (and I'll try the new one ASAP). -Michael