Package: gcc-10
Version: 10.2.0-16
Severity: wishlist
When upgrading from 10.2.0-15 to 10.2.0-16 aptitude reports that gcc-10 is
282MB larger, g++-10 is 312MB larger, and cpp-10 is 283MB larger. In -15
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/lto1 is 26M and in -16
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/lto1
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:20:25PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 04:14:34PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some
kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha
amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mipsel
reopen 385580
notfixed 385580 6.10~0
done
Oops, this was supposed to go to 385582
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 01:27:15PM -0400, you wrote:
Version: 6.10~0
gcc 4.2 seems to be the default on all archs now, which should mean that
coreutils can build the sha2 utilities on s390.
--
Michael Stone
Severity: serious
Package: gcc
gcc has been building parts of coreutils on s390 (sha384 sha512) in a
way that silently generates incorrect results. (Caught by tests during
the coreutils build process.) This has been traced to a bug in gcc:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:14:32PM -0600, you wrote:
coreutils fails to build from source on m68k, test failing.
Well, it works everywhere else. GCC compile error? The test that's
failing is the sha1sum validation, the source for which has not changed.
Mike Stone
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:29:03AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
This libc ld.so special handling for hardware capability is used by
only MMX currently. We expand it not only for MMX but also CMOV.
MMX, intel's multi media extension, is also same circumstance that
both Pentium (i586) and
6 matches
Mail list logo
