Hi
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I would rather drop any package which does use c++11 features without any
reflection.
I now understand the problem. Thanks.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:10:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
No, just because some random c++11
Package: gcc-4.7
Version: 4.7.1-3
Severity: normal
I was playing with -fstack-protector flag to lern this hardening thing.
There may be some regression.
Here is my toy example C code with buffer overflow.
=
#include stdio.h
#include
Package: gcc-4.4-base
Version: 4.4.4-14
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Many URL links listed in README.C++ are broken.
Let's clean this up and make this documentation robust to such URL
moves using attached patch.
Broken links are removed.
I intentionally did not list non-parasoft mirror sites
If BUG 159804 is stupid question rather than a BUG for the maintainer ,
please treat this as wishlist for the missing warning. (I think it is a
bug.)
Osamu
--
+++
+ Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ Cupertino, CA USA +
4 matches
Mail list logo