maintainer request
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pgp6RAR9cXxSM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
an
> [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30973
> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111814
> [3]
> https://gcc.gnu.org/cgit/gcc/commit/?id=2a643f55f5acc05dcc7cee133647bf3193d5b563
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`.
/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916591
> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108151
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
result to unreleased.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Hello,
On Sat, 2025-06-21 at 18:36 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Comparing stages 2 and 3
> Comparison successful.
> if false; then \
> rm -rf stage2-*; \
> echo timestamp > stage2-lean; \
> fi
> make[4]: Leaving directory '/<>/build'
27;m trying to build gcc-15 on sh4 with Algol enabled now while also
cherry-picking
upstream patches to fix LRA support in the SH backend and also enable it by
default.
I will file a separate bug report for that patch.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Hi,
On Sat, 2025-06-07 at 13:32 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> The gcc maintainer will certainly know better whether all of these are
> needed to fix the build and consequently avoid other packages from being
> miscompiled or failing to build.
I was not able to tune gcc-14
from being
miscompiled or failing to build.
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1]
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=04c9cf5c786b94fbe3f6f21f06cae73a7575ff7a
> [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-15&suite=experimental
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
gs in MPFR.
In which version is this fixed? 4.2.2?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
#x27;`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
?
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
ation and figure out how to resolve
it?
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
[2]
https://tests.reprodu
ation and figure out how to resolve
it?
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
[2]
https://tests.reprodu
ation and figure out how to resolve
it?
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
[2]
https://tests.reprodu
ation and figure out how to resolve it?
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
[2]
https://tests.reprodu
xie which is
clearly not what you intended.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tracked upstream [1], I'm
just reporting this bug to raise more awareness and help track the issue within
Debian.
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113357
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-
to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-13-cross-mipsen
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1]
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-14&arch=hurd-i386&ver=14.1.0-2&stamp=1718795837&raw=0
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-bpf
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org
t;rs_no_cpu" in debian/rules.defs.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
option parsing; aborting
I assume the oversight was that on x32, the architecture is not used as a
package prefix
but a package suffix, i.e. gccrs-14-x86-64-linux-gnux32 instead of
gccrs-14-x32-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : D
327
> [2] http://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/gcc-14_14.1.0-1_x32.build.gz
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
There are no changes
required for sparc64.
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072071
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
nks,
Adrian
> [1]
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-14&arch=x32&ver=14.1.0-1&stamp=1715675531&raw=0
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=nvptx-tools
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s/ada-armel-libatomic.diff
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=creduce
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=cvise
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gtest as
it helps the migration software to figure out the right versions to
combine in the tests.
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?pa
s the migration software to figure out the right versions to
combine in the tests.
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-12
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=binutils&arch=sh4&ver=2.41-6&stamp=1697044502&raw=0
> [2]
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=e2fsprogs&arch=sh4&ver=1.47.0-2%2Bb1&stamp=1697478803&raw=0
> [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
.
- Please disable Ada, D, Go and M2 for loong64 in debian/rules.def.
- Please add "!loong64" for gdb in debian/control.m4
The attached patch implements these changes.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-
sn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] h
7;t affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-
Hi YunQiang, mips porters,
On 28-04-2023 15:51, YunQiang Su wrote:
Paul Gevers 于2023年4月27日周四 04:26写道：
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 23:10:29 + James Addison wrote:
Hi Frederic: I'm linking a forwarded GCC GNU bug report that I _think_ is the
upstream report matching this bug. I found it f
Hi Michael!
On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 20:25 +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 09:38:56AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > After a long discussion on IRC and the mailing list, we have agreed to
> > raise the
> > baseline for the alpha architecture t
or "--with-arch=ev56".
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1]
> https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/glibc/-/commit/7af7b56d5f5fef7a4f3c011b36774e4556563d3d
> [2]
> https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/glibc/-/commit/4d57b6af3efd1d6af277b2eb67fe9ee500e7ae68
--
.''`. John Pau
take some time)
[1] - https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/issues/21789
We're you ever made aware of this bug in gcc-11 and gcc-12? Maybe a bit
of your help is appropriate.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 16:07 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> TL;DR: I want to propose a GCC 14 change which will impact
> distributions, so I'd like to gather some feedback from Debian.
Is this change being made the upstream defaults?
Or will it be a distro override like the hardening flags are?
control: reopen -1
control: found -1 3+c2
Hi,
The version chosen in version 3+c2 is lower than what's in the archive.
Version 12.2.0-14cross2 is still available in unstable while this upload
only built version 12.2.0-14cross1.
Paul
elbrus@coccia:~$ cat
/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/
[[21:04:30] adsb: thanks for looking; but the source is 3+c1, no? or
did the older one generate a newer binary?
You may want to check your logic.
Paul
ly in the autopkgtest as
it helps the migration software to figure out the right versions to
combine in the tests.
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[0] You can see what pac
.
Adrian
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026201
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Hi YunQiang,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:07:51 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: gcc-12-cross-mipsen
Your package
failed to build on mips64el while it built there successfully in the past.
Can you please look into this issue? It's blocking the migration of
several RC bug fixes.
the Debian baseline on i386 doesn't support sse2. So
this is an issue in filezilla. If you still want to build on i386 (which
apparently you don't), you must ensure that filezilla builds without the
sse2 pieces.
Paul
PS: if you want filezilla to be part of bookworm, you need to
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
eyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=cvise
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e.php?p=gcc-snapshot&suite=sid
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
ue to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-12-cross-mipsen
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bookworm, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libffi
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/p/python3.10/27000260/log.gz
== Tests result: FAILURE ==
397 tests OK.
1 test failed:
test_ctypes
20 tests
n
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-11
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/l/linux/26272813/log.gz
I: Found quick flavour cloud-amd64
I: Build for 5.19.0-1-cloud-amd64
make: Entering
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 08:00:39 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: gcc-11-cross-ports
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Ping. gcc-11-cross-ports hasn't built since 1 February 2022.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP di
].
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-defaults
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/x/xtl/24112985/log.gz
Running
and reassign the
bug to the right package?
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-12
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest
Control: user debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertags 1012107 - riscv64
Control: forcemerge 1000449 1012107
On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 09:48 +, xiao sheng wen wrote:
> Usertags: riscv64
> readelf -h
> /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/3b/7ede587dea6f4387552e0baad2596c7bec28dc.debug
> readelf:
to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=cvise
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-enable JIT for m68k for the next gcc-12 upload?
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
lease Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-11-cross-ports
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi YunQiang,
On 24-03-2022 12:29, YunQiang Su wrote:
Yes. I am aware of it. And I am waiting for gcc-12-cross-mipsen to finish
building on all of these architectures.
Although not clear to me why you wanted to wait, this happened 3.5 days
ago. Will you do the source only upload soon?
Paul
Hi YunQiang,
On 22-03-2022 07:06, YunQiang Su wrote:
Paul Gevers 于2022年3月22日周二 04:04写道：
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:51:28 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in
Hi mips porters,
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:51:28 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in
testing [1]. Your package src:gcc-defaults-mipsen has been trying to
migrate
ild on mips64el.
Paul
because the build succeeded, but the binaries are not
installable [1].
Can you please fix your package and do a source-only upload such that
it can migrate to testing?
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-11-cross-mipsen
Paul
e 2 - Soft Freeze
2023-03-12 - Milestone 3 - Hard Freeze
TBA- Milestone 4 - Full Freeze
On behalf of the Release Team,
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
th -f)
Changing "alpha.c" to "alpha.cc" in the patch fixes the problem.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Hi YunQiang,
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:51:28 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
Your package src:gcc-defaults-mipsen has been trying to
migrate for 62 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug.
Any progress? It has been 1.5 months and I haven't seen anything
happening. This is NOK. gcc-defaults-mipsen
hanks,
Adrian
> [1]
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=23987912ddb4207de0714d81237f93f613557d1f
> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104189
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'
On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 18:38 +0100, наб wrote:
> I don't disagree, but /e/p.d/* can't be symlinks to /u/s.
I don't think that is correct (since systemd symlinks from /etc to
/usr), but if it were then just copying the files would work instead.
> However, please consider new, simplified, patch bel
[1]
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hsail-tools&arch=s390x&ver=0%7E20180830-1&stamp=1578612130&raw=0
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin
Source: debugedit
Version: 1:5.0-4
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
Please drop the 'gcc-driver.diff' debian patch from the debugedit
source package. The patch breaks testsuite tests 6, 7, 11, 14, 18, and
23, all of which involve partial linking[1], when compiling on an
oldstable Debian 10 Buster
, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bookworm, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
27;m only reporting it now because I'm finally at the end of my todo
lists).
The file in question is :
lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
It can easely be reproduced with:
sudo apt install dlocate
sudo dlocate -md5check libgcc1:amd64 | grep FAILED
If there is anything I can do to help,
Hi Matthias!
On 10/11/21 15:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> This did not fix the bug, unfortunately. libffi is still being built with
> "-mcpu=power8" on ppc64, see the full build log in [1].
>
> We didn't need --enable-portable before, so this isn't the
tests.
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-defaults
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/s/simde/15914134/log.gz
in the tests.
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-defaults
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/s/seqan3
re to figure out the right
versions to combine in the tests.
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-defaults
https://ci.debian.net
is bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-defaults
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/o/open3d/15926028/log.gz
autopkgtest [01:10:43]: tes
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-defaults
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/d/deal.ii/15913694/log.gz
-- Build
version which is not compatible with libffi [2].
Adrian
> [1]
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libffi&arch=ppc64&ver=3.4.2-3&stamp=1633957534&raw=0
> [2] https://github.com/libffi/libffi/issues/662
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debia
Hi Mattias!
On 10/8/21 11:21, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I will try to build cmake with gcc-11 and see if that makes any difference.
Building with gcc-11 fixes the problem and cmake builds fine.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - g
have seen this issue before and
didn't understand what the problem was. At least I do now.
I will try to build cmake with gcc-11 and see if that makes any difference.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Fre
Hello!
On 9/29/21 00:38, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> There is actually a baseline violation on i386 as "-march=amdfam10" is
> passed to the compiler, see the build log in [1], for example.
Comparing the build logs, it seems that this an issue with the newer version
of a
Hi!
On 9/28/21 22:40, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> We should therefore pass "--enable-portable-binary" in debian/rules.
There is actually a baseline violation on i386 as "-march=amdfam10" is
passed to the compiler, see the build log in [1], for example.
libffi/libffi/blob/master/m4/ax_gcc_archflag.m4#L209
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
independently
verified that. It might be that libffi performs a runtime detection
during build which causes the library to be built with a higher
baseline on the POWER8 buildds.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:13:50 +0200 наб wrote:
> Here's a debdiff, which:
> 1. installs the conffiles 644
> 2. simplifies on/off toggling
> 3. => doesn't pollute the environment with an empty DEBUGINFOD_URLS
> when off
> 4. fixes debuginfod.csh on the csh from current sid
> (it fa
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
Control: retitle -1 RFP: gcc-riscv32-none -- GCC cross compiler for 32-bit
RISC-V processors
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:45:49 +0100 Stefan Tauner wrote:
> So this should actually be an RFP class bug?
> Should this one be converted or closed and another one opened?
Converti
Package: libdebuginfod-common
Version: 0.183-7
Severity: normal
The libdebuginfod-common package is just a copy of the libdebuginfo1
package with "common files" tacked on:
Description: library to interact with debuginfod (common files)
The libdebuginfo1 package provides a library with an i
disable Ada in gcc-11 on m68k until the issue has been fixed upstream?
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@p
l bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
Could you therefore disable Go on ia64 for the time being in both gcc-11 and
-snapshot?
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1]
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-11&
he Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-9-cross
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> On Oct 2, 2020, at 1:30 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> On 10/2/20 1:26 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>>> On Oct 2, 2020, at 1:18 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> both gcc-10-cross and gcc-10-cross-ports are building ok. Not sure what you
>>&
> On Oct 2, 2020, at 1:18 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> both gcc-10-cross and gcc-10-cross-ports are building ok. Not sure what you
> are
> trying to do here.
Cross-building a native compiler using “sbuild —host=$ARCH”. That failed when
linking gm2.
Adrian
ve that as well.
Adrian
> [1]
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=9aa357c75358a51f038e50f7c8d9207b58c157e0
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
oss := no
Since cross-builing failed for me with gm2 enabled, I assume it's best to
remove the line
"m2_no_cross := no" from debian/rules.defs to unbreak cross-builds of
src:gcc-10.
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://sources.debian.org/src/gcc-10/10.2.0-13/debian/rules.defs/#L1247
the issue has been resolved?
It's most likely a bug in glibc and not gcc itself but prevents the Go
backend from being built.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - gla
1 - 100 of 281 matches
Mail list logo
