brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx writes:
This is a standard and idiomatic usage of Berkeley sockets. AFAIK,
there is no other way to work with the sockets interface, and even if
there were, this method is extremely common, not to mention sanctioned
by POSIX.
It may be
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx writes:
I expect that when used on a POSIX system (at least in strict POSIX mode
or when invoked as c99), gcc-4.4 neither warns nor generates code
contrary to POSIX with -O2 -Wall.
You can add -fno-strict-aliasing which will disable the
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx writes:
I'm aware of that. My opinion remains the same: GCC should generate
POSIX-conformant code without warnings with -O2 -Wall. That can be
achieved by disabling -fstrict-aliasing at -O2, by patching glibc to
allow aliasing of the relevant
the
terminating null character if there is room or if the array is of
unknown size) initialize the elements of the array
So string3 is correctly initialized with the two bytes '1' and '2' and
the terminating null is discarded.
--
Philip Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
'
mmap2::const_iterator mi2; // error: expected `;' before 'mi2'
}
};
You need to use:
typename mmap::const_iterator mi;
typename mmap2::const_iterator mi2;
See the discussion about dependent names in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
--
Philip
Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 01:01 +, Philip Martin wrote:
I find the libtool inter-library documentation confusing, but I think this
is a Debian bug simply because Debian's libtool fails and GNU's libtool
appears to work. Is there some reason
will no longer find
members of a dependent base
You need to refer to this-f rather than the unqualified f.
--
Philip Martin
definition, the usual lookup rules (3.4.1, 3.4.2) are used for
nondependent names
--
Philip Martin
This is currently an open issue with the C++ standard library, see
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#280
--
Philip Martin
unsigned int rand(unsigned int max) {
unsigned int rval = (unsigned int)(((double)max)*rand()/(RAND_MAX));
if (rval == max)
return max-1;
}
This function returns no value if rval != max so the behaviour is
undefined.
--
Philip Martin
crash.
--
Philip Martin
11 matches
Mail list logo
