ar becuase they thought you would.
Is your point that actually it's not just a matter of formwarding -
some armel-specific investigation is needed first to work out what's actually
wrong?
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Debian, Wookware, ARM
http://wookware.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2023-11-24 18:58 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Unfortunately, eller is down
Eller had to move hosting provider at short notice. It is now racked
again but needs network configuration for new location. It will
hopefully re-appear by end-Monday.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Debian, Wookw
out_results[4] << 4 | out_results[5]
<< 5 |
out_results[6] << 6 | out_results[7] << 7);
}
// last bitmap should be non-zero, fired on gcc-9.3 aarch64 -O3
assert(bitmap[7] != 0);
return 0;
}
Attached is a tested patch.
--
Wookey
diff -u gcc-8-
the
polymake codebase, which ICEs all the way back to GCC 6, so this has
been around for a while.
(Thanks for investigating, Alex)
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM
http://wookware.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
So this is the failing command from the build:
g++ -c -o
/home/wookey/debian/polymake-4.1/build/Opt/apps/common/cpperl/SparseMatrix-2.o
-MMD -MT
/home/wookey/debian/polymake-4.1/build/Opt/apps/common/cpperl/SparseMatrix-2.o
-MF
/home/wookey/debian/polymake-4.1/build/Opt/apps/common/cpperl
.
Building the one file alone:
g++ -c -o
/home/wookey/debian/polymake-4.1/build/Opt/apps/common/cpperl/SparseMatrix-2.o
-MMD -MT
/home/wookey/debian/polymake-4.1/build/Opt/apps/common/cpperl/SparseMatrix-2.o
-MF
/home/wookey/debian/polymake-4.1/build/Opt/apps/common/cpperl/SparseMatrix-2.o.d
ng.
Wouldn't it make sense to leave this bug open for anyone that needs to
fix this for use on stable? I guess it's linked from the arm64ilp32
port page so the fairly small number of people that care can probably
find it even if closed.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, AR
@
pr77857 \
pr80533 \
pr60818 \
+arm64-ilp32-default \
ifeq ($(libstdcxx_abi),new)
debian_patches += libstdc++-functexcept
>From 7a35625da966a0aa0733843fee7d100e2f026808 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wookey <woo...@wookware.org>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 01:58:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH
Package: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9.2-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
gcc 4.9.1-19 removed the top-level option to set no_biarch_libs = yes when
building crosscompilers.
-ifdef DEB_CROSS_NO_BIARCH
- no_biarch_libs := yes
-endif
+no_biarch_libs :=
Then 4.9.2-2 removed another related stanza
- ifdef
of an issue.
Wookey
Index: cross-gcc/debian/rules.conf
===
--- cross-gcc.orig/debian/rules.conf
+++ cross-gcc/debian/rules.conf
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ ifeq ($(with_shared_libgcc),yes)
LIBGCC_DEP := libgcc$(GCC_SONAME)$(LS)$(AQ
+++ Helmut Grohne [2014-11-01 10:38 +0100]:
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:46:48AM +, Wookey wrote:
To me that sounds like this method is actually the
current de-facto default in Debian - it is certainly at least on a par.
I don't think that a feature being de-facto default is a good
to keep the
cross-binutils and cross-gcc packages in sync.
these bugs ? It seems to me that it would be easy to come up with a
workflow that allowed Matthias to usertag these kind of bugs and hand
them over to the cross teams.
Sounds reasonable to me. Asking Wookey whether he would like
Package: gcc-4.9
Followup-For: Bug #755061
More investigation has tracked this down to a missing patch in the
Debian glibc vs the Ubuntu glibc. So merging this bug with #759042.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
+++ peter green [2014-08-12 04:14 +0100]:
Filed upstream with Linaro to see if they can shed any light.
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
+++ Matthias Klose [2014-08-09 15:58 +0200]:
Am 09.08.2014 um 12:17 schrieb Wookey:
+++ Wookey [2014-08-09 11:12 +0100]:
Can you please do an upload with this in ASAP as the only package that
is out of date (and thus got rejected in the initial upload to the
main debian archive) is now
-intrinsics.texi exists
+
+ -- Wookey woo...@debian.org Sat, 09 Aug 2014 00:09:53 +
+
gcc-4.9 (4.9.1-4) unstable; urgency=high
* Update to SVN 20140731 (r213317) from the gcc-4_9-branch.
diff -u gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/rules.patch gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/rules.patch
--- gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/rules.patch
+++ Wookey [2014-08-09 11:12 +0100]:
Can you please do an upload with this in ASAP as the only package that
is out of date (and thus got rejected in the initial upload to the
main debian archive) is now gcc-4.9. And we need that bootstrap set to
start the official buildds next week.
Sorry
not at all clear which package/binary is actually at
fault. Needs more investigation.
Wookey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/20140810004046.4936.33105
Package: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9.1-4
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertag: arm64
Latest gcc failed to build for arm64:
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-4.9arch=arm64ver=4.9.1-4stamp=1406833943
make[5]: *** No rule to make target
+++ Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer [2014-08-03 16:40 -0300]:
Copied up to Linaro toolchain team at:
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
than 4.8
except for things that are broken for all arches.
Did you try an arm64 rebuild with 4.9 in Ubuntu?
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
-4.8.2/debian/changelog gcc-4.8-4.8.2/debian/changelog
--- gcc-4.8-4.8.2/debian/changelog
+++ gcc-4.8-4.8.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gcc-4.8 (4.8.2-16+arm64.1) unreleased; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Ensure arm-acle-intrinsics.texi exists
+
+ -- wookey woo...@wookware.org
)
I'm not sure if the same argument applies to the D compiler?
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Package: gcc-4.7
Version: 4.7.2-12
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch
building cross gcc targetting arm64 fails during the gcc stage1 build
due to including limits.h even though stage1 is configured with
--without-headers.
This is the offending bit of log:
/home/wookey/linaro/armv8/toolchain
started.
Will investigate further.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
point
format being odd. There are a few details on
http://wiki.debian.org/ArmPort which may provide clues.
I think you need to debug the binary giving errors in order to get a
better idea where the problem might lie.
Wookey
--
Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679
26 matches
Mail list logo
