--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-26 08:14
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] [ia64] ICE in push_secondary_reload
However, it is my understanding that breaks that affect only Ada are
*not* considered critical, and in fact
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-22 15:42
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] xnmake gets miscompiled during bootstrap
with ada enabled
I'm getting this build error on a Linux build using gcc 3.3.2 on RH9 - is this
the same problem
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-19 22:30
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] xnmake gets miscompiled during bootstrap
with ada enabled
According to the changelog, these are:
2003-12-08 Arnaud Charlet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* sinfo.h
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-12 10:59
---
Subject: Re: would be nice if gnatmake passed -fprofile-arcs to gnatlink
If I pass valid arguments and valid code to gnatmake, and it fails to create
working code, how is that not a bug?
The above
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-12 11:08
---
Subject: Re: would be nice if gnatmake passed -fprofile-arcs to gnatlink
Besides which, it's a regression.
In the strict sense, yes.
But the regression comes from the fact that -fprofile-arcs wasn't
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2003-10-21 16:18
---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error
The other error _is_
6 matches
Mail list logo
