--- Comment #48 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 19:55
---
4.3 is no longer a regression as it does PTA faster than 4.1, and uses less
memory.
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 19:35 ---
This one is mine.
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #43 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 18:03
---
On my current branch, which i will commit soon, i have
tree PTA : 14.56 ( 1%) usr 0.57 ( 1%) sys 16.98 ( 1%) wall
26372 kB ( 2%) ggc
tree alias analysis : 577.90 (26%) usr 8.72 ( 8%) sys
--- Comment #23 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-12 19:09
---
Subject: Bug 28544
Author: dberlin
Date: Mon Mar 12 19:09:05 2007
New Revision: 122857
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122857
Log:
2007-03-12 Daniel Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fix PR
--- Comment #24 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-12 19:12
---
Fixed
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #21 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 23:41
---
(In reply to comment #20)
Is there a backport of the mainline patch that I could review, or ask another
maintainer to review for inclusion in 4.2?
Thanks,
-- Mark
The attached patch named
--- Comment #8 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-09 14:38 ---
I can trivially fix this, but the code isn't going to do what you want when i'm
done, since it is an aliasing violation :)
The assert in question just happens to be good at catching them.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #10 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-09 01:28
---
Subject: Bug 27093
Author: dberlin
Date: Tue May 9 01:28:47 2006
New Revision: 113641
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113641
Log:
2006-05-08 Daniel Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fix PR
--- Comment #11 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-09 02:08
---
Fixed
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #9 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-07 18:18 ---
Mine
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned
--- Comment #6 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 16:52 ---
G. These phi nodes are all dead, but it still is verifying them anyway.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27093
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug
--- Comment #23 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-03 03:19
---
Subject: Bug 26626
Author: dberlin
Date: Wed May 3 03:19:22 2006
New Revision: 113493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113493
Log:
2006-05-02 Daniel Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fix PR
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-19
21:08 ---
They are auto-replies from debian's bug system.
I changed the bug reporter so it would stop the mail loop.
I wish the debian guys would stop putting auto-responders as the owners of bugs.
There are quite
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
Summary: [3.4 regression] ICE with -pg
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
16 matches
Mail list logo