https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37637
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59758
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
still fails to build with the proposed patch on sparc-linux-gnu
In file included from
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:20:0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59770
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59758
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sparc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59758
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.2
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18
11:44:57 UTC ---
the proposed patch lets the build succeed
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-13
06:21:36 UTC ---
still seen on the 4.6 branch with 20111012
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12
19:16:01 UTC ---
I'll check, however I don't see the fix for 50326 applied to the 4.6 branch.
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com 2011-07-21 08:31:56
UTC ---
Created attachment 24801
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24801
preprocessed volume.i source
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49690
Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-12-18 17:00:55
UTC ---
same build failure on ia64-linux
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486
Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46479
Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-09-21 14:59 ---
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=gcc-snapshot
yes, 20100918 still fails to build:
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: s390-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45394
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.0
Known to work||4.5.1
http
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-08-24 10:29 ---
seen as well with 20100824
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45394
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
--- Comment #20 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-03-17 10:51 ---
no change in the libjava testsuite when built with these binutils
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching
--- Comment #16 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-03-16 13:42 ---
this change doesn't make any change to the libjava test results (configured
--with-mode=thumb).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported
--- Comment #18 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-03-16 23:30 ---
rebuilding binutils 2.20.1 with the patch from comment #17 shows one
regression:
Running /home/doko/binutils/binutils-2.20.1/ld/testsuite/ld-arm/arm-elf.exp ...
FAIL: ld-arm/unwind-4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #2 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 14:27 ---
Subject: Bug 42676
Author: doko
Date: Sat Mar 13 14:27:27 2010
New Revision: 157422
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=157422
Log:
2010-03-13 Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com
PR libgcj/42676
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-03-12 15:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=20095)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20095action=view)
differences for generated header files
these are the differences, when generated with gjavah 20100312; the namespace
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org|pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #7 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-02-15 15:32 ---
this seems to be the patch for the ARM unwind table linker processing? if yes,
see http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10695 for some comments.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860
--- Comment #13 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-21 14:30 ---
std::basic_ios.3, std::basic_ofstream.3, std::basic_ostream.3,
std::basic_ostringstream.3, std::ios_base.3:
.PP
Definition at line 657 of file ios_base.h.
.SS \fBstreamsize\fP std::ios_base::width () const\fC [inline
--- Comment #11 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-20 13:58 ---
the man pages still have problems with escape codes used (prefix backslashes);
I didn't build and run the check tool yet again.
Matthias
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- You
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42725
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery, ice
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-13 13:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=19571)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19571action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42725
--- You are receiving this mail
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 14:33 ---
this is fixed on the trunk, preparing a backport to the branch
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42710
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 16:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=19560)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19560action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42710
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 16:50 ---
configured with --enable-checking=release
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42707
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #3 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 17:14 ---
Subject: Bug 40859
Author: doko
Date: Tue Jan 12 17:14:15 2010
New Revision: 155840
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155840
Log:
2010-01-12 Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com
PR libjava
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 23:04 ---
verified with binutils/gcc builds from 20100112 trunks
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42532
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter
--- Comment #6 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 15:13 ---
Subject: Bug 40134
Author: doko
Date: Mon Jan 4 15:13:08 2010
New Revision: 155617
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155617
Log:
2010-01-04 Mikael Pettersson mi...@it.uu.se
PR target
--- Comment #10 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-13 23:45 ---
Subject: Bug 40133
Author: doko
Date: Sun Dec 13 23:45:12 2009
New Revision: 155200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155200
Log:
2009-12-11 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-12-08 12:36 ---
yes, re-testing with the version from the ML. currently passed the libstdc++
build.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42317
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Comment #4 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-04 07:48 ---
Subject: Bug 40134
Author: doko
Date: Fri Dec 4 07:47:51 2009
New Revision: 154973
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154973
Log:
2009-12-04 Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com
John David
--- Comment #3 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-19 14:26 ---
Subject: Bug 40134
Author: doko
Date: Mon Oct 19 14:26:28 2009
New Revision: 152975
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152975
Log:
2009-10-19 Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com
PR target/40134
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-10-14 17:24 ---
138206 2008-07-28 OK
2008-11-16 FAIL (gcc-snapshot build)
that looks consistent with my test builds; with the 2008-07-28 build the ld
testsuite passes without failures
--
http
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-10-14 21:21 ---
A binary search through the gcc-4.4 snapshots has identified 4.4-20080822 as
the last good(*) snapshot and 4.4-20080829 as the first bad one.
build in between fail for me with:
/opt/doko/gcc/139572/./gcc/xgcc -B/opt/doko
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-10-14 21:26 ---
looking at the interval there a three arm specific commits:
2008-08-23 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
2008-08-23 Sebastian Redl sebastian.r...@getdesigned.at
- r139509: exception propagation support
2008
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo dot carlini at oracle
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #9 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 15:18 ---
Subject: Bug 28050
Author: doko
Date: Mon Jun 22 15:18:38 2009
New Revision: 148804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148804
Log:
gcc/
2009-06-22 Steven Bosscher ste...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #11 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 22:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28050
Author: doko
Date: Mon Jun 22 22:21:17 2009
New Revision: 148819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148819
Log:
gcc/
2009-06-22 Steven Bosscher ste...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 22:25 ---
Subject: Bug 28050
Author: doko
Date: Mon Jun 22 22:25:38 2009
New Revision: 148820
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148820
Log:
gcc/
2009-06-22 Steven Bosscher ste...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-06-20 01:21 ---
The SH port does use a linker script to link with both -lgcc_s and -lgcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40134
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching
--- Comment #11 from doko at debian dot org 2009-05-13 16:28 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbols ce...@glibcxx_3.4.3
not exported
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb:
--- Comment #10 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 23:01 ---
Sorry for the delay
--- Comment #7 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-07 06:55 ---
Subject: Bug 40038
Author: doko
Date: Thu May 7 06:55:15 2009
New Revision: 147217
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147217
Log:
2009-05-07 Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com
PR libstdc
--- Comment #8 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-07 07:03 ---
Subject: Bug 40038
Author: doko
Date: Thu May 7 07:03:17 2009
New Revision: 147218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147218
Log:
2009-05-07 Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com
PR libstdc
--- Comment #6 from doko at debian dot org 2009-04-29 21:36 ---
Subject: Re: libstdc++ generates man pages, which conflict
with the linux manpages
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb:
--- Comment #1 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 22:35 ---
Is this any better
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-04-23 09:14 ---
turned out, that a wrong newlib build for spu was used. closing as invalid.
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-04-21 14:36 ---
- config/abi/pre/gnu.ver needs the __signbitl symbol mentioned as well.
- the patch has an empty #ifdef/#endif at the end
with this change the symbol is found in the library. checked with a native
build on hppa-linux
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-29 10:14 ---
when Ray wrote he tested with a snapshot build, I assume this was 20090107
without the patch applied, so the status on the trunk is not known yet. will
test with current trunk later.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #10 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-29 22:36 ---
I'm able to reproduce it with trunk 20090129. The gsf-scan executable links
against the just built libgsf.so, so I assume we have to look for a miscompiled
file in libgsf.
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #8 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-05 18:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=17034)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17034action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
--- You are receiving this mail
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16952|0 |1
is obsolete||
http://gcc.gnu.org
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16953|0 |1
is obsolete||
http://gcc.gnu.org
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-22 10:58 ---
no, same result.
btw, in the generated .ii file using -D__disable_PCH__ -save-temps, the
precompiled header is still referenced.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
--- You are receiving
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-10-14 07:21 ---
reverting r141077 on current trunk lets the bootstrap succeed on sparc-linux
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: sparc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37815
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #28 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-09-06 22:53 ---
so this bites again with trunk and ada. Jim, Steve, any news on this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27880
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #11 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-17 10:05 ---
Subject: Bug 25343
Author: doko
Date: Thu Jul 17 10:04:51 2008
New Revision: 137918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137918
Log:
2008-07-17 Roman Zippel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR target/25343
--- Comment #21 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-10 03:51 ---
Subject: Bug 28322
Author: doko
Date: Thu Jul 10 03:51:04 2008
New Revision: 137687
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137687
Log:
2008-07-10 Peter Maydell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR other
--- Comment #17 from doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2008-06-25 22:16
---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] Miscompiled code with -O2 (but not with -O2
-funroll-loops) on ia64
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
Anyway, can you help me reproduce the issue, so I can take
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #47 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-17 13:47 ---
Subject: Bug 11953
Author: doko
Date: Sun Dec 17 13:46:58 2006
New Revision: 119986
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119986
Log:
2006-12-17 Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Comment #48 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-17 13:53 ---
Subject: Bug 11953
Author: doko
Date: Sun Dec 17 13:53:07 2006
New Revision: 119987
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119987
Log:
2006-12-17 Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Comment #49 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-17 13:57 ---
Subject: Bug 11953
Author: doko
Date: Sun Dec 17 13:57:31 2006
New Revision: 119988
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119988
Log:
2006-12-17 Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-12-09 10:20 ---
works with 4.0.3
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-12-09 11:39 ---
works in Debian unstable as well; Ubuntu specific.
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
