--- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 16:07 ---
Patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00667.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42706
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
--- Comment #6 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 18:00 ---
Subject: Bug 42706
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Jan 14 18:00:34 2010
New Revision: 155911
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155911
Log:
2010-01-14 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
PR tree
--- Comment #7 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 18:02 ---
Fixed.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 11:07 ---
Patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00562.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42703
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
--- Comment #7 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 15:37 ---
Subject: Bug 42703
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Jan 13 15:37:37 2010
New Revision: 155863
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155863
Log:
2010-01-13 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
PR tree
--- Comment #8 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 15:38 ---
Fixed.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 17:26 ---
Mine.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 21:05 ---
I would say that the dd.c[4] access into an array that is four chars
long has undefined behavior. It is also the reason why
build_ref_for_offset cannot find a suitable array element for it,
because there is none
--- Comment #17 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-06 12:22
---
Note to self: PR 40874 is related.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
--- Comment #20 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 15:09
---
OK, here is the status regarding the trunk (4.4) and the test cases
posted here:
1. The test case in the bug description now works in the sense that
funk is inlined even when not performing early inlining
--- Comment #19 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 17:51
---
As of revision 138092 we are handling this much better.
The example in bug description gets inlined at -O2 even with
-fno-early-inlining.
The example in comment #10 does not work as expected yet. The new
--- Comment #16 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-16 13:27
---
I'm now working on inlining of indirect calls (PR 9079) and intend to allow for
inlining of calls through member pointers too.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #18 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-01 14:50
---
I'm now working on a proper fix.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
13 matches
Mail list logo
