--- Comment #14 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 23:03 ---
Sigh. I've tested the changed testcase only on 32bit :-( Update to r132300.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35065
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bu
--- Comment #12 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 16:18 ---
Whoops, sorry. I fixed the warnings in a different copy of the testcase
than the one I committed :-( Committed the right version now. (Yes, it still
tests what it should test, without the var-tracking patch it runs
--- Comment #10 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 15:00 ---
This is fixed now.
--
matz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #9 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 14:54 ---
Subject: Bug 35065
Author: matz
Date: Wed Feb 13 14:53:59 2008
New Revision: 132286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132286
Log:
PR debug/35065
* var-tr
--- Comment #8 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 16:06 ---
Actually the code in var-tracking.c does handle the situation that a reg
contains multiple decls. Or better it tries to. If there weren't an
obvious bug in clobber_variable_part(). With that fixed the lo
--- Comment #7 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 15:36 ---
The immediate problem is that the solution iterates between two orders.
On my machine (i686) it all happen around basic block 231. The even
iterations (after 128 iterations) the var-track info for bb 231 starts with
--- Comment #12 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-10 08:57 ---
Mark, please apply to 4.1 branch also.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is
7 matches
Mail list logo
