[Bug bootstrap/12371] [3.4/3.5 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare

2004-02-28 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||build http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug bootstrap/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare

2004-01-10 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-10 23:25 --- can't debug this till the earlier one is fixed -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn

[Bug bootstrap/13562] [3.4 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux

2004-01-10 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||12371 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13562

[Bug bootstrap/11060] [3.4 regression] [m68k] bootstrap error in libgcj

2004-01-10 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-10 23:20 --- It was suggested that a similar fix to the one on ARM be implemented. Does anyone understand that code area well enough to try doing that? If it works it would be nice and simple. (I don't

[Bug c++/13544] [3.3.3 regression] conflicting types for enums in different scopes

2004-01-08 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-08 21:44 --- This is biting Debian rather badly. Can this possibly be fixed quickly? :-/ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13544 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported

[Bug bootstrap/11060] [3.4 regression] [m68k] bootstrap error in libgcj

2003-12-31 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||build http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11060 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug libstdc++/8610] large file support in libstdc++-v3 (std::streamoff type is 32-bit in GCC 3.2 whereas it was 64-bit in GCC 2.96)

2003-10-13 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8610 --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-13 04:55 --- Library fix status? 3.4 is going into stage 3 soon --- You are receiving

[Bug optimization/12223] [3.3.2 regression] Compiler generates infinite loop

2003-09-19 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12223 neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added GCC

[Bug c++/11437] ICE in lookup_name_real

2003-07-12 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/11437] ICE in lookup_name_real

2003-07-09 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-09 03:54 --- The bug will also show up with __imag and __real. If I replace __imag__ with something

[Bug c++/11437] ICE in lookup_name_real

2003-07-09 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/11437] ICE in lookup_name_real

2003-07-09 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-09 05:51 --- OK. I now understand things better, and see that __imag is supposed to be an operator

[Bug c++/11437] ICE in lookup_name_real

2003-07-09 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/11459] -stdc=c99 -pedantic -ansi warns about C90's non long-long support when in C99 mode

2003-07-09 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11459 neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/11437] ICE in lookup_name_real

2003-07-09 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-09 22:01 --- Created an attachment (id=4374) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id

[Bug c/11459] -stdc=c99 -pedantic -ansi warns about C90's non long-long support when in C99 mode

2003-07-08 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11459 neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added